Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of S/F94 as a proxy for COVID-19 severity
Maaike C Swets; Steven Kerr; James Scott-Brown; Adam B Brown; Rishi K Gupta; Jonathan E Millar; Enti Spata; Fiona McCurrach; Andrew D Bretherick; Annemarie B Docherty; David Harrison; Kathy Rowan; Neil Young; - ISARIC4C; Geert H Groeneveld; Jake Dunning; Jonathan S Nguyen-Van-Tam; Peter JM Openshaw; Peter W Horby; Ewen M Harrison; Natalie Staplin; Malcolm G Semple; Nazir Lone; J Kenneth Baillie.
Afiliación
  • Maaike C Swets; Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • Steven Kerr; Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • James Scott-Brown; School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  • Adam B Brown; Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • Rishi K Gupta; Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
  • Jonathan E Millar; Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • Enti Spata; Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit at the University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Population Health (NDPH), Oxford, UK
  • Fiona McCurrach; EMERGE, NHS Lothian, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  • Andrew D Bretherick; MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
  • Annemarie B Docherty; Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • David Harrison; Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, London, UK
  • Kathy Rowan; Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, London, UK
  • Neil Young; Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  • - ISARIC4C;
  • Geert H Groeneveld; Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
  • Jake Dunning; Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Jonathan S Nguyen-Van-Tam; Population and Lifespan Health, University of Nottingham School of Medicine, Nottingham, UK
  • Peter JM Openshaw; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Peter W Horby; Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Ewen M Harrison; Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • Natalie Staplin; Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit at the University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Population Health (NDPH), Oxford, UK
  • Malcolm G Semple; Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
  • Nazir Lone; Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • J Kenneth Baillie; Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Preprint en En | PREPRINT-MEDRXIV | ID: ppmedrxiv-22280081
ABSTRACT
Optimising statistical power in early-stage trials and observational studies accelerates discovery and improves the reliability of results. Ideally, intermediate outcomes should be continuously distributed and lie on the causal pathway between an intervention and a definitive outcome such as mortality. In order to optimise power for an intermediate outcome in the RECOVERY trial, we devised and evaluated a modification to a simple, pragmatic measure of oxygenation function - the SaO2/FIO2 (S/F) ratio. We demonstrate that, because of the ceiling effect in oxyhaemoglobin saturation, S/F ceases to reflect pulmonary oxygenation function at high values of SaO2. Using synthetic and real data, we found that the correlation of S/F with a gold standard (PaO2/FIO2, P/F ratio) improved substantially when measurements with SaO2 [≥] 0.94 are excluded (Spearman r, synthetic data S/F 0.31; S/F94 0.85). We refer to this measure as S/F94. In order to test the underlying assumptions and validity of S/F94 as a predictor of a definitive outcome (mortality), we collected an observational dataset including over 39,000 hospitalised patients with COVID-19 in the ISARIC4C study. We first demonstrated that S/F94 is predictive of mortality in COVID-19. We then compared the sample sizes required for trials using different outcome measures (S/F94, the WHO ordinal scale, sustained improvement at day 28 and mortality at day 28) ensuring comparable effect sizes. The smallest sample size was needed when S/F94 on day 5 was used as an outcome measure. To facilitate future study design, we provide an online user interface to quantify real-world power for a range of outcomes and inclusion criteria, using a synthetic dataset retaining the population-level clinical associations in real data accrued in ISARIC4C https//isaric4c.net/endpoints. We demonstrated that S/F94 is superior to S/F as a measure of pulmonary oxygenation function and is an effective intermediate outcome measure in COVID-19. It is a simple and non-invasive measurement, representative of disease severity and provides greater statistical power to detect treatment differences than other intermediate endpoints.
Licencia
cc_by_nd
Texto completo: 1 Colección: 09-preprints Base de datos: PREPRINT-MEDRXIV Tipo de estudio: Experimental_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Rct Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Preprint
Texto completo: 1 Colección: 09-preprints Base de datos: PREPRINT-MEDRXIV Tipo de estudio: Experimental_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Rct Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Preprint