Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety and Immunogenicity of anti-SARS CoV-2 vaccine SOBERANA 02 in homologous or heterologous scheme.
Maria Eugenia Toledo-Romani; Leslihana Verdecia Sanchez; Meybis Rodriguez Gonzalez; Laura Rodriguez Noda; Carmen Valenzuela Silva; Beatriz Paredes Moreno; Belinda Sanchez Ramirez; Rocmira Perez Nicado; Raul Gonzalez Mugica; Tays Hernandez Garcia; Gretchen Bergado Baez; Franciscary Pi Estopinan; Otto Cruz Sui; Anitza Fraga Quintero; Majela Garcia Montero; Ariel Palenzuela Diaz; Gerardo Baro Roman; Ivis Mendoza Hernandez; Sonsire Fernandez Castillo; Yanet Climent Ruiz; Darielys Santana Mederos; Ubel Ramirez Gonzalez; Yanelda Garcia Vega; Beatriz Perez Masson; Guang Wu Chen; Tammy Boggiano Ayo; Eduardo Ojito Magaz; Daniel G. Rivera; Yury Valdes Balbin; Dagmar Garcia Rivera; vicente Verez Bencomo; - SOBERANA Research Group.
Afiliación
  • Maria Eugenia Toledo-Romani; Pedro KouriTropical Medicine Institute
  • Leslihana Verdecia Sanchez; Clinic 1
  • Meybis Rodriguez Gonzalez; Finlay Vaccine Institute
  • Laura Rodriguez Noda; Finlay Vaccine Institute
  • Carmen Valenzuela Silva; Cybernetics, Mathematics and Physics Institute
  • Beatriz Paredes Moreno; Finlay Vaccine Institute
  • Belinda Sanchez Ramirez; Centre of Molecular Immunology
  • Rocmira Perez Nicado; Finlay Vaccine Institute
  • Raul Gonzalez Mugica; Finlay Vaccine Institute
  • Tays Hernandez Garcia; Centre of Molecular Immunology
  • Gretchen Bergado Baez; Centre of Molecular Immunology
  • Franciscary Pi Estopinan; Centre of Molecular Immunology
  • Otto Cruz Sui; National Civil Defense Research Laboratory
  • Anitza Fraga Quintero; National Civil Defense Research Laboratory
  • Majela Garcia Montero; National Civil Defense Research Laboratory
  • Ariel Palenzuela Diaz; Centre for Immunoassays
  • Gerardo Baro Roman; Centre for Immunoassays
  • Ivis Mendoza Hernandez; National Clinical Trials Coordinating Center
  • Sonsire Fernandez Castillo; Finlay Vaccine Institute
  • Yanet Climent Ruiz; Finlay Vaccine Institute
  • Darielys Santana Mederos; Finlay Vaccine Institute
  • Ubel Ramirez Gonzalez; Finlay Vaccine Institute
  • Yanelda Garcia Vega; Centre of Molecular Immunology
  • Beatriz Perez Masson; Centre of Molecular Immunology
  • Guang Wu Chen; Chengdu Olisynn Biotech. Co. Ltd., and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center
  • Tammy Boggiano Ayo; Centre of Molecular Immunology
  • Eduardo Ojito Magaz; Centre of Molecular Immunology
  • Daniel G. Rivera; Laboratory of Synthetic and Biomolecular Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Havana
  • Yury Valdes Balbin; Finlay Vaccine Institute
  • Dagmar Garcia Rivera; Finlay Vaccine Institute
  • vicente Verez Bencomo; Finlay Vaccine Institute
  • - SOBERANA Research Group;
Preprint en En | PREPRINT-MEDRXIV | ID: ppmedrxiv-21266309
ABSTRACT
BackgroundSOBERANA 02 is a COVID-19 conjugate vaccine candidate based on SARS-CoV-2 recombinant RBD conjugated to tetanus toxoid. SOBERANA Plus antigen is dimeric-RBD. Here we report safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity from phase I and IIa clinical trials using two-doses SOBERANA 02 (homologous protocol) and three-doses (homologous) or heterologous (with SOBERANA Plus) protocols. MethodWe performed an open-label, monocentric, sequential and adaptive phase I for evaluating safety, reactogenicity and exploring immunogenicity of SOBERANA 02 in two formulations (15 and 25 g) in 40 subjects, 19-59 years old. Phase IIa was open-label including 100 volunteers 19-80 years, receiving two doses of SOBERANA 02-25 g. In both trials, half of volunteers received a third dose of SOBERANA 02, half received a heterologous dose of SOBERANA Plus-50 g. Primary outcomes were safety and reactogenicity. The secondary outcome was vaccine immunogenicity evaluated by anti-RBD IgG ELISA, molecular neutralization test of RBDhACE2 interaction, live-virus neutralization test and specific T-cells response. ResultsThe most frequent AE was local pain, other AEs had frequencies [≤] 5%. No serious related AEs were reported. Phase IIa confirmed the safety results in 60-80 years subjects. In phase-I SOBERANA 02-25{micro}g elicited higher immune response than SOBERANA 02-15 {micro}g; in consequence, the higher dose progressed to phase IIa. Phase IIa results confirmed the immunogenicity of SOBERANA 02-25 g even in 60-80 age range. Two doses of SOBERANA02-25 g elicited an immune response similar to that of the Cuban Convalescent Serum Panel; it was higher after both the homologous and heterologous third doses; the heterologous scheme showing a higher immunological response. ConclusionsSOBERANA 02 was safe and immunogenic in persons aged 19-80 years, eliciting neutralizing antibodies and specific T cell response. Highest immune responses were obtained in the heterologous three doses protocol. Trial registry https//rpcec.sld.cu/trials/RPCEC00000340 and https//rpcec.sld.cu/trials/RPCEC00000347
Licencia
cc_by_nd
Texto completo: 1 Colección: 09-preprints Base de datos: PREPRINT-MEDRXIV Tipo de estudio: Experimental_studies / Prognostic_studies / Rct Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Preprint
Texto completo: 1 Colección: 09-preprints Base de datos: PREPRINT-MEDRXIV Tipo de estudio: Experimental_studies / Prognostic_studies / Rct Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Preprint