Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A randomized, double-blind phase I clinical trial of two recombinant dimeric RBD COVID-19 vaccine candidates: safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity
Sonia Perez-Rodriguez; Meiby de la Caridad Rodriguez-Gonzalez; Rolando Ochoa-Azze; Yanet Climent-Ruiz; Carlos Alberto Gonzalez-Delgado; Beatriz Paredes-Moreno; Carmen Valenzuela-Silva; Laura Rodriguez-Noda; Rocmira Perez-Nicado; Raul Gonzalez-Mugica; Marisel Martinez-Perez; Belinda Sanchez-Ramirez; Tays Hernandez-Garcia; Alina Diaz-Machado; Maura Tamayo-Rodriguez; Alis Martin-Trujillo; Jorman Rubino-Moreno; Anamary Suarez-Batista; Marta Dubed-Echevarria; Maria Teresa Perez-Guevara; Mayte Amoroto-Roig; Yanet Chappi-Estevez; Gretchen Bergado-Baez; Franciscary Pi-Estopinan; Guang-Wu Chen; Yury Valdes-Balbin; Dagmar Garcia-Rivera; Vicente Verez-Bencomo.
Afiliación
  • Sonia Perez-Rodriguez; National Centre of Toxicology, Havana, Cuba
  • Meiby de la Caridad Rodriguez-Gonzalez; Finlay Vaccine Institute, Havana, Cuba
  • Rolando Ochoa-Azze; Finlay Vaccine Institute, Havana, Cuba
  • Yanet Climent-Ruiz; Finlay Vaccine Institute, Havana, Cuba
  • Carlos Alberto Gonzalez-Delgado; National Centre of Toxicology, Havana, Cuba
  • Beatriz Paredes-Moreno; Finlay Vaccine Institute, Havana, Cuba
  • Carmen Valenzuela-Silva; Institute of Cybernetics, Mathematics and Physics, Havana, Cuba
  • Laura Rodriguez-Noda; Finlay Vaccine Institute, Havana, Cuba
  • Rocmira Perez-Nicado; Finlay Vaccine Institute, Havana, Cuba
  • Raul Gonzalez-Mugica; Finlay Vaccine Institute, Havana, Cuba
  • Marisel Martinez-Perez; Finlay Vaccine Institute, Havana, Cuba
  • Belinda Sanchez-Ramirez; Centre of Molecular Immunology, Havana, Cuba
  • Tays Hernandez-Garcia; Centre of Molecular Immunology, Havana, Cuba
  • Alina Diaz-Machado; National Centre of Toxicology, Havana, Cuba
  • Maura Tamayo-Rodriguez; National Centre of Toxicology, Havana, Cuba
  • Alis Martin-Trujillo; National Centre of Toxicology, Havana, Cuba
  • Jorman Rubino-Moreno; National Centre of Toxicology, Havana, Cuba
  • Anamary Suarez-Batista; Research Center of Civil Defense, Mayabeque, Cuba
  • Marta Dubed-Echevarria; Research Center of Civil Defense, Mayabeque, Cuba
  • Maria Teresa Perez-Guevara; Research Centre of Civil Defense, Mayabeque, Cuba
  • Mayte Amoroto-Roig; National Coordinating Centre of Clinical Trials, Havana, Cuba
  • Yanet Chappi-Estevez; National Coordinating Centre of Clinical Trials, Havana, Cuba
  • Gretchen Bergado-Baez; Centre of Molecular Immunology, Havana, Cuba
  • Franciscary Pi-Estopinan; Centre of Molecular Immunology, Havana, Cuba
  • Guang-Wu Chen; Chengdu Olisynn Biotech. Co. Ltd., and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, People's R
  • Yury Valdes-Balbin; Finlay Vaccine Institute, Havana, Cuba
  • Dagmar Garcia-Rivera; Finlay Vaccine Institute, Havana, Cuba
  • Vicente Verez-Bencomo; Finlay Vaccine Institute, Havana, Cuba
Preprint en En | PREPRINT-MEDRXIV | ID: ppmedrxiv-21264522
Artículo de revista
Un artículo publicado en revista científica está disponible y probablemente es basado en este preprint, por medio del reconocimiento de similitud realizado por una máquina. La confirmación humana aún está pendiente.
Ver artículo de revista
ABSTRACT
BackgroundThe Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is the target for many COVID-19 vaccines. Here we report results for phase 1 clinical trial of two COVID-19 vaccine candidates based on recombinant dimeric RBD (d-RBD). MethodsWe performed a randomized, double-blind, phase I clinical trial in the National Centre of Toxicology in Havana. Sixty Cuban volunteers aged 19-59 years were randomized into three groups (20 subjects each) 1) FINLAY-FR-1 (50 mcg d-RBD plus outer membrane vesicles from N. meningitidis); 2) FINLAY-FR-1A-50 mcg d-RBD (three doses); 3) FINLAY-FR-1A-25 mcg d-RDB (three doses). The FINLAY-FR-1 group was randomly divided to receive a third dose of the same vaccine candidate (homologous schedule) or of FINLAY-FR-1A-50 (heterologous schedule). The primary outcomes were safety and reactogenicity. The secondary outcome was vaccine immunogenicity. Humoral response at baseline and following each vaccination was evaluated using live-virus neutralization test, anti-RBD IgG ELISA and in-vitro neutralization test of RBDhACE2 interaction. ResultsMost adverse events were of mild intensity (63.5%), solicited (58.8%), and local (61.8%); 69.4% with causal association with vaccination. Serious adverse events were not found. The FINLAY-FR-1 group reported more adverse events than the other two groups. After the third dose, anti-RBD seroconversion was 100%, 94.4% and 90% for the FINLAY-FR-1, FINLAY-FR-1A-50 and FINLAY-FR-1A-25 respectively. The in-vitro inhibition of RBDhACE2 interaction increased after the second dose in all formulations. The geometric mean neutralizing titres after the third dose rose significantly in the group vaccinated with FINLAY-FR-1 with respect to the other formulations and the COVID-19 Convalescent Serum Panel. No differences were found between FINLAY-FR-1 homologous or heterologous schedules. ConclusionsVaccine candidates were safe and immunogenic, and induced live-virus neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. The highest values were obtained when outer membrane vesicles were used as adjuvant. Trial registryhttps//rpcec.sld.cu/en/trials/RPCEC00000338-En
Licencia
cc_by_nc_nd
Texto completo: 1 Colección: 09-preprints Base de datos: PREPRINT-MEDRXIV Tipo de estudio: Experimental_studies / Prognostic_studies / Rct Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Preprint
Texto completo: 1 Colección: 09-preprints Base de datos: PREPRINT-MEDRXIV Tipo de estudio: Experimental_studies / Prognostic_studies / Rct Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Preprint