CHOP-based chemotherapy is as effective as alternating PEEC/CHOP chemotherapy in a randomised trial in high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Scotland and Newcastle Lymphoma Group.
Eur J Cancer
; 33(8): 1195-201, 1997 Jul.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-9301442
The aim of this study was to test whether survival for patients with high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) can be improved with a non-cross-resistant regimen as compared to a CHOP-based regimen. This is a multicentre study comprising 325 adult patients, median age 58 years, with high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: patients of any age and performance status were eligible provided they were able to receive the drugs in the regimens. Patients were randomised to either B-CHOP-M (bleomycin, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone and methotrexate) or PEEC-M (methylprednisolone, vindesine, etoposide, chlorambucil and methotrexate) alternating with B-CHOP-M. At a median follow-up of 9 years, there was no significant difference in overall survival or disease-free survival between the two arms. Toxicities for the two regimens were equivalent. This study confirms that for relatively unselected patients with high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, an alternating multidrug regimen does not improve upon the results obtained with B-CHOP-M.
Buscar en Google
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Linfoma no Hodgkin
/
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica
Tipo de estudio:
Clinical_trials
/
Observational_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Límite:
Adult
/
Aged
/
Humans
/
Middle aged
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Eur J Cancer
Año:
1997
Tipo del documento:
Article
Pais de publicación:
Reino Unido