The relative radiolucencies of breast implant filler materials.

Young, V L; Diehl, G J; Eichling, J; Monsees, B S; Destouet, J

Young, V L; Diehl, G J; Eichling, J; Monsees, B S; Destouet, J.

Afiliación

Young VL; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mallincrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Mo.

Plast Reconstr Surg ; 91(6): 1066-72, 1993 May.

Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8479972

RESUMEN

Breast implants in current use utilize silicone gel for filler material. One substantial drawback of silicone gel is its radiodensity, resulting in the obscuration of breast tissue on mammography. The relative radiolucencies of silicone gel, saline, breast tissue equivalent, triglycerides (peanut oil), and polyvinylpyrrolidone (Bio-Oncotic gel) were determined by using standard mammographic equipment. Visibility through these materials was compared by using a standard breast phantom as background. The x-ray dosage necessary to create each mammographic image was measured. Peanut oil provided the clearest image of the phantom artifacts, required the least radiation exposure, and was approximately four times more radiolucent than the saline or Bio-Oncotic gel and about 45 times more radiolucent than silicone gel. As improved implant filler materials are being sought, triglycerides maintain superior radiographic properties.

Asunto(s)

Mamoplastia; Mamografía; Prótesis e Implantes; Aire; Femenino; Humanos; Modelos Estructurales; Aceite de Cacahuete; Aceites de Plantas; Povidona; Siliconas; Triglicéridos

Buscar en Google

Añadir a Mi BVS

Imprimir

XML

PubMed Links

Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prótesis e Implantes / Mamografía / Mamoplastia Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Año: 1993 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Buscar en Google

Añadir a Mi BVS

Imprimir

XML

PubMed Links