Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Laparoscopic and conventional suture of perforated peptic ulcers--a comparison]. / Laparoskopische und konventionelle Ubernähung perforierter peptischer Ulcera--eine Gegenüberstellung.
Eypasch, E; Spangenberger, W; Ure, B; Mennigen, R; Troidl, H.
Afiliación
  • Eypasch E; II. Chirurgischer Lehrstuhl, Universität zu Köln.
Chirurg ; 65(5): 445-50, 1994 May.
Article en De | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8050299
After the first successful laparoscopic closure of a perforated peptic ulcer in 1990, 13 consecutive patients with laparoscopic closure were compared to 8 previous patients with conventional surgery. The endpoints adverse advents (complications), pain intensity, fever, leucocytosis and hospital stay showed no clinically relevant differences. Consumption of analgesics was lower in the laparoscopy group. Laparoscopic closure of perforated peptic ulcer is technically feasible. The safety of the method and the benefit for the patient need proof by a randomized controlled trial.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Úlcera Péptica Perforada / Úlcera Gástrica / Técnicas de Sutura / Laparoscopía / Úlcera Duodenal Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: De Revista: Chirurg Año: 1994 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Alemania
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Úlcera Péptica Perforada / Úlcera Gástrica / Técnicas de Sutura / Laparoscopía / Úlcera Duodenal Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: De Revista: Chirurg Año: 1994 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Alemania