Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Recovery of left ventricular function after surgery for aortic and mitral regurgitation with heart failure.
Lai, Wei-Tsung; Chen, I-Chen; Hsiung, Ming-Chon; Lin, Ting-Chao; Huang, Kuan-Chih; Chang, Chung-Yi; Wei, Jeng.
Afiliación
  • Lai WT; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
  • Chen IC; Heart Center, Cheng-Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Hsiung MC; Heart Center, Cheng-Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Lin TC; Heart Center, Cheng-Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Huang KC; Heart Center, Cheng-Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Chang CY; Institute of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Wei J; Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev ; 23: 200329, 2024 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39295958
ABSTRACT

Background:

Severe aortic regurgitation (AR) and mitral regurgitation (MR) can lead to left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction; however, there are limited data about recovery of LV after surgery for AR or MR. Little is known to guide the management of combined AR and MR (mixed valvular heart disease [VHD]). This study is sought to investigate the predictors of postoperative LV function recovery in left-sided regurgitant VHD with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), especially for mixed VHD.

Methods:

From 2010 to 2020, 2053 adult patients underwent aortic or mitral valve surgery at our center. The patients with valvular stenosis, infective endocarditis, concomitant revascularization, and preoperative LVEF ≥40 % were excluded. A total of 127 patients were included in this study 22 patients with predominant AR (AR group), 64 with predominant MR (MR group), and 41 with combined AR and MR (AMR group).

Results:

The mean preoperative LVEF was 32.4 %, 30.7 %, and 30.2 % (p = 0.44) in the AR, MR, and AMR groups, respectively. The AR group was more likely to have postoperative LVEF recovery. The cut-point of left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) for better recovery was 49 mm for the MR group and 58 mm for the AMR group.

Conclusion:

LV dysfunction due to combined AR and MR has similar remodeling reserve as AR, and better recoverability than MR. Thus, double-valve surgery is recommended before the LVESD is > 58 mm.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Taiwán Pais de publicación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Taiwán Pais de publicación: Países Bajos