BACKGROUND: Intraoperative functional mapping for glioma resection often necessitates awake craniotomies, requiring active patient participation. This procedure presents challenges for both the surgical team and the patient. Thus, minimizing mapping time becomes crucial. Passive mapping utilizing electrocorticography (ECoG) presents a promising approach to reduce intraoperative mapping efforts via direct electrical stimulation. This study aims to identify an efficient mapping protocol for hand movement by optimizing mapping duration and localization accuracy. METHODS: Three glioma patients (two males, one female) underwent awake craniotomy for tumor resection at Asahikawa Medical University Hospital and Kindai University in Osaka. Patients were maintained at a bispectral index (BIS) level above 90 to ensure wakefulness during mapping. Data were collected using a DC-coupled g.HIamp biosignal amplifier, digitized with 24-bit resolution at a minimum sampling rate of 1,200 Hz. Each session comprised ten runs, each lasting 250 seconds, consisting of a 12-second rest phase (baseline) followed by a 12-second grasping period containing ten grasping movements. High-gamma activity (HGA, 60-170 Hz) was recorded from ECoG locations on the pre- and postcentral gyrus. Locations exhibiting significant grasping-related HGA, with stronger responses during early trials within a run, were classified as "attenuated". RESULTS: Among 37 electrodes on the sensorimotor cortex, 16 exhibited significant HGA during grasping. Three locations demonstrated significant attenuation after three runs, with one location showing attenuation after the first three trials within a run. CONCLUSIONS: The observed attenuation effect of short-term repeated movements during intraoperative monitoring is relatively modest initially. However, as the number of repeated grasping blocks increases, the number of attenuated locations also rises. Consequently, minimizing overall mapping time, rather than reducing the number of tasks per block, is paramount. For statistical analysis, a minimum of 20 grasping trials (two runs of ten movements) or 48 seconds of motor mapping is recommended. Alternatively, a mapping protocol involving a third run or 30 grasping trials (72 seconds) may enhance data robustness. These preliminary findings, though based on a limited patient cohort, warrant confirmation and further investigation, particularly in epilepsy patients.