Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Visually induced involuntary arm, head, and torso movements.
Martin, Alexandra; Bakshi, Avijit; Ventura, Joel; Panic, Alexander S; Lackner, James R.
Afiliación
  • Martin A; Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Laboratory, MS 033, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA, 02454, USA.
  • Bakshi A; Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Laboratory, MS 033, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA, 02454, USA.
  • Ventura J; Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Laboratory, MS 033, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA, 02454, USA.
  • Panic AS; Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Laboratory, MS 033, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA, 02454, USA.
  • Lackner JR; Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Laboratory, MS 033, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA, 02454, USA. lackner@brandeis.edu.
Exp Brain Res ; 2024 Sep 18.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39292248
ABSTRACT
We explored in 75 s long trials the effects of visually induced self-rotation and displacement (SR&D) on the horizontally extended right arm of standing subjects (N = 12). A "tool condition" was included in which subjects held a long rod. The extent of arm movement was contingent on whether the arm was extended out Freely or Pointing at a briefly proprioceptively specified target position. The results were nearly identical when subjects held the rod. Subjects in the Free conditions showed significant unintentional arm deviations, averaging 55° in the direction opposite the induced illusory self-motion. Deviations in the Pointing conditions were on average a fifth of those in the Free condition. Deviations of head and torso positions also occurred in all conditions. Total arm and head deviations were the sum of deviations of the arm and head with respect to the torso and deviations of the torso with respect to space. Pointing subjects were able to detect and correct for arm and head deviations with respect to the torso but not for the arm and head deviations with respect to space due to deviations of the torso. In all conditions, arm, head, and torso deviations began before subjects experienced SR&D. We relate our findings to being an extension of the manual following response (MFR) mechanism to influence passive arm control and arm target maintenance as well. Visual-vestibular convergence at vestibular nuclei cells and multiple cortical movement related areas can explain our results, MFR results, and classical Pass Pointing. We distinguish two Phases in the induction of SR&D. In Phase 1, the visual stimulation period prior to SR&D onset, the arm, head, and torso deviations are first apparent, circa < 1 s after stimulus begins. They are augmented at the onset of Phase 2 that starts when SR&D is first sensed. In Phase 2, reaching movements first show curved paths that are compensatory for the Coriolis forces that would be generated on the reaching arm were subjects actually physically rotating. These movement deviations are in the opposite direction to the MFR and the arm, head, and torso deviations reported here. Our results have implications for vehicle control in environments that can induce illusory self motion and displacement.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Exp Brain Res Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Exp Brain Res Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Alemania