Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Psychometric Analysis of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS).
Miley, Emilie N; Casanova, Madeline P; Pickering, Michael A; Cheatham, Scott W; Larkins, Lindsay W; Cady, Adam C; Baker, Russell T.
Afiliación
  • Miley EN; Institute of Sports Sciences and Medicine, Department of Health, Nutrition and Food Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA.
  • Casanova MP; Tallahassee Orthopedic Clinic, Tallahassee, FL 32308, USA.
  • Pickering MA; WWAMI Medical Education Program, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.
  • Cheatham SW; Idaho Office of Underserved and Rural Medical Research, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.
  • Larkins LW; Department of Movement Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.
  • Cady AC; Department of Movement Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.
  • Baker RT; Department of Movement Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 12(17)2024 Sep 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39273814
ABSTRACT
Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey (HOOS) was developed as a region- and disease-specific outcome to assess hip disability. Despite the use of the HOOS in clinical practice and research, psychometric analyses of the scale in a large dataset of patients have not been performed. As such, the purposes of this study were to assess the structural validity of the HOOS in patients who underwent a total hip arthroplasty. Data were obtained from the Surgical Outcome System (SOS) global registry. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to assess the scale structure of the 40-item HOOS and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to identify a parsimonious scale structure. The parsimonious model identified was subjected to multi-group and longitudinal invariance testing and LGC modeling. The original five-factor, 40-item HOOS did not meet recommended model fit indices values (CFI = 0.822, TLI = 0.809, IFI = 0.822, RMSEA = 0.085). Alternate model generation identified an alternative model (i.e., HOOS-9). Sound model fit was identified for the HOOS-9 (CFI = 0.974, TLI = 0.961, RMSEA = 0.046). Invariance testing criteria were also met between groups (i.e., age and sex) and across time. Lastly, a nonlinear growth trajectory was identified in responses pertaining to hip disability. The original scale structure of the 40-item HOOS was not supported. The HOOS-9 met contemporary model fit recommendations, along with multi-group and longitudinal invariance testing. Our findings support the preliminary use of the HOOS-9 to assess hip function and disability in research and clinical practice.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Healthcare (Basel) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Healthcare (Basel) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Suiza