Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A cross-national investigation of CT, MRI, PET, mammography, and radiation therapy resources and utilization.
Aoyama, Takahiro; Koide, Yutaro; Shimizu, Hidetoshi; Urikura, Atsushi; Kitagawa, Tomoki; Hashimoto, Shingo; Tachibana, Hiroyuki; Kodaira, Takeshi.
Afiliación
  • Aoyama T; Department of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan. aoyamat@aichi-cc.jp.
  • Koide Y; Department of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan.
  • Shimizu H; Department of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan.
  • Urikura A; Department of Radiological Technology, Radiological Diagnosis, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
  • Kitagawa T; Department of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan.
  • Hashimoto S; Department of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan.
  • Tachibana H; Department of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan.
  • Kodaira T; Department of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan.
Jpn J Radiol ; 2024 Sep 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39240460
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This study aimed to analyze the domestic and international landscape of imaging diagnostics and treatments, focusing on Japan, to provide current insights for policymaking, clinical practice enhancement, and international collaboration.

METHODS:

Data from 1996 to 2021 were collected from Japan's Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare database for medical device counts of CT, MRI, PET, mammography, and radiotherapy. The National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan was utilized for examination numbers. An international comparison was made with data from 41 countries using the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) database.

RESULTS:

The data included a total of 108,596 CT devices, 47,233 MRI devices, 2998 PET devices, 20,641 MMG devices, and 8023 RT devices during the survey period. Upon international comparison, Japan ranked first in CT and MRI devices per million people and second in examination numbers per 1000 people. The number of PET devices per million people exceeded OECD averages; however, the number of examinations per 1000 people was below the OECD average in 2020 (Japan 4.0, OECD 4.9). Although Japan exceeded OECD averages in mammography device counts (Japan 33.8, OECD 24.5 in 2020), radiotherapy device counts were similar to OECD averages (Japan 8.3, OECD 7.9 in 2020).

CONCLUSION:

We have analyzed the utilization of equipment in the context of diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy in Japan. Since the initial survey year, all devices have shown an upward trend. However, it is essential not only to increase the number of devices and examinations but also to address the chronic shortage of radiologists and allied health professionals. Based on the insights gained from this study, understanding the actual status of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy equipment is critical for grasping the domestic situation and may contribute to improving the quality of healthcare in Japan.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Jpn J Radiol Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / RADIOLOGIA / RADIOTERAPIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón Pais de publicación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Jpn J Radiol Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / RADIOLOGIA / RADIOTERAPIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón Pais de publicación: Japón