The protein domains of vertebrate species in which selection is more effective have greater intrinsic structural disorder.
Elife
; 122024 Sep 06.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-39239703
ABSTRACT
The nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution posits variation among species in the effectiveness of selection. In an idealized model, the census population size determines both this minimum magnitude of the selection coefficient required for deleterious variants to be reliably purged, and the amount of neutral diversity. Empirically, an 'effective population size' is often estimated from the amount of putatively neutral genetic diversity and is assumed to also capture a species' effectiveness of selection. A potentially more direct measure of the effectiveness of selection is the degree to which selection maintains preferred codons. However, past metrics that compare codon bias across species are confounded by among-species variation in %GC content and/or amino acid composition. Here, we propose a new Codon Adaptation Index of Species (CAIS), based on Kullback-Leibler divergence, that corrects for both confounders. We demonstrate the use of CAIS correlations, as well as the Effective Number of Codons, to show that the protein domains of more highly adapted vertebrate species evolve higher intrinsic structural disorder.
Evolution is the process through which populations change over time, starting with mutations in the genetic sequence of an organism. Many of these mutations harm the survival and reproduction of an organism, but only by a very small amount. Some species, especially those with large populations, can purge these slightly harmful mutations more effectively than other species. This fact has been used by the 'drift barrier theory' to explain various profound differences amongst species, including differences in biological complexity. In this theory, the effectiveness of eliminating slightly harmful mutations is specified by an 'effective' population size, which depends on factors beyond just the number of individuals in the population. Effective population size is normally calculated from the amount of time a 'neutral' mutation (one with no effect at all) stays in the population before becoming lost or taking over. Estimating this time requires both representative data for genetic diversity and knowledge of the mutation rate. A major limitation is that these data are unavailable for most species. A second limitation is that a brief, temporary reduction in the number of individuals has an oversized impact on the metric, relative to its impact on the number of slighly harmful mutations accumulated. Weibel, Wheeler et al. developed a new metric to more directly determine how effectively a species purges slightly harmful mutations. Their approach is based on the fact that the genetic code has 'synonymous' sequences. These sequences code for the same amino acid building block, with one of these sequences being only slightly preferred over others. The metric by Weibel, Wheeler et al. quantifies the proportion of the genome from which less preferred synonymous sequences have been effectively purged. It judges a population to have a higher effective population size when the usage of synonymous sequences departs further from the usage predicted from mutational processes. The researchers expected that natural selection would favour 'ordered' proteins with robust three-dimensional structures, i.e., that species with a higher effective population size would tend to have more ordered versions of a protein. Instead, they found the opposite species with a higher effective population size tend to have more disordered versions of the same protein. This changes our view of how natural selection acts on proteins. Why species are so different remains a fundamental question in biology. Weibel, Wheeler et al. provide a useful tool for future applications of drift barrier theory to a broad range of ways that species differ.
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Selección Genética
/
Vertebrados
/
Evolución Molecular
Límite:
Animals
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Elife
Año:
2024
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
Estados Unidos
Pais de publicación:
Reino Unido