Clinical-statistical study on oral rehabilitation methods using dental implants.
Med Pharm Rep
; 97(3): 398-404, 2024 Jul.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-39234447
ABSTRACT
Background and aims:
The development of dental implantology is based on a thorough examination of the interaction of implants with the surrounding tissues, as well as methods of stimulating osteogenesis around implants. The most common approach to restore lost dentition in terms of function and aesthetics is now represented by implants. The objective of our study was to comparatively assess the efficiency of prosthetic treatments performed on implants alone versus on implants in conjunction with abutment teeth.Methods:
The study was carried out over seven years (2016-2023), with evaluations at one, two, three, and five years. For this analysis, MedCalc® version 12.5.0.0 (MedCalc® Software, Mariakerke, Belgium) was utilised as the medical statistical software. Results andconclusions:
When using dental implants and natural teeth abutments for prosthodontic reconstruction, the failure rates rise approximately 43 times when compared to dental implant rehabilitation; similarly, osteoporosis and diabetes mellitus increase failure rates by 32 and 20 times, respectively. Gingival inflammation is a frequent event (almost 50% frequency) observed during follow-up of patients who had prosthetic restoration using dental implants alone as well as implants and abutment teeth. For both groups, difficulties usually arise two years later.
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Med Pharm Rep
Año:
2024
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
Rumanía
Pais de publicación:
Rumanía