Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ceftazidime-avibactam: Combination therapy versus monotherapy in the challenge of pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.
Liu, Chang-Wei; Chen, Qiang; Ding, Nan; Hu, Li-Fen.
Afiliación
  • Liu CW; Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, PR China.
  • Chen Q; The Grade 3 Pharmaceutical Chemistry Laboratory of State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, PR China.
  • Ding N; Department of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, PR China.
  • Hu LF; Anhui Center for Surveillance of Bacterial Resistance, Hefei, PR China.
Heliyon ; 10(16): e35757, 2024 Aug 30.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39220988
ABSTRACT
This research focused on evaluating the clinical results of patients suffering from pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP), who received treatment with either ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) alone or in combination with other antibiotics. From January 2020 to December 2023, we retrospectively analyzed CRKP-related pneumonia patients treated in two Chinese tertiary hospitals. Mortality was measured at 14 and 30 days as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the 14-day microbiological cure rate and the 14-day clinical cure rate. Factors contributing to clinical failure were evaluated via both univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression. To account for confounding factors, propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized. Among the 195 patients with CRKP infections, 103 (52.8 %) received CZA combination therapy, and 92 (47.2 %) patients received CZA monotherapy. The combination therapy group exhibited superior clinical and microbiological cure rates compared to the monotherapy group, with a 14-day clinical cure rate of 60.1 % vs. 45.7 % (P = 0.042) and a 14-day microbiological cure rate of 72.8 % vs. 58.6 % (P = 0.038), respectively. Combination therapy reduced mortality rates at 14 days (7.8 % vs. 17.4 %, P = 0.041), but not at 30 days (14.6 % vs. 25.0 %, P = 0.066). Even after using PSM, the group treated with the CZA combination continued to had a lower mortality rate at 14 days (5.9 % vs. 17.6 %, P = 0.039). The 14-day clinical cure rate for the combination therapy group was 63.2 %, and the 14-day microbial cure rate was 77.9 %. Both of these statistics were notably greater than those observed in the monotherapy group. Furthermore, the multivariate logistic regression model indicated a significant link between combination therapy and a decrease in clinical failure. Carbapenems were noted to be the most effective class of concomitant agents. Our findings indicate that patients with pneumonia due to CRKP benefit from combination treatment of CZA rather than monotherapy; administering carbapenem in combination with CZA in the early stages could provide considerable survival benefits.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Heliyon Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Heliyon Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido