Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Early versus delayed timing of primary repair after open-globe injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
McMaster, David; Bapty, James; Bush, Lana; Serra, Giuseppe; Kempapidis, Theo; McClellan, Scott F; Woreta, Fasika A; Justin, Grant A; Agrawal, Rupesh; Hoskin, Annette K; Cavuoto, Kara; Leong, James; Ascarza, Andrés Rousselot; Cason, John; Miller, Kyle E; Caldwell, Matthew C; Gensheimer, William G; Williamson, Tom H; Dhawahir-Scala, Felipe; Shah, Peter; Coombes, Andrew; Sundar, Gangadhara; Mazzoli, Robert A; Woodcock, Malcolm; Watson, Stephanie L; Kuhn, Ferenc; Colyer, Marcus; Gomes, Renata Sm; Blanch, Richard J.
Afiliación
  • McMaster D; Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Bapty J; Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.
  • Bush L; Neuroscience and Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Serra G; Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy; Northern Hub for Veterans and Military Families Research, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK.
  • Kempapidis T; BRAVO VICTOR, London, UK.
  • McClellan SF; Vision Center of Excellence, Research & Development Directorate (J-9), Defence Health Agency, MD, USA.
  • Woreta FA; Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, MD, USA.
  • Justin GA; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, MD, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Agrawal R; National Healthcare Group Eye Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Singapore; Duke NUS Medical School, Singapore.
  • Hoskin AK; Save Sight Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Lions Eye Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
  • Cavuoto K; Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
  • Leong J; Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Ascarza AR; Universidad del Salvador, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Cason J; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, MD, USA.
  • Miller KE; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, MD, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Navy Medical Center Portsmouth, VA, USA.
  • Caldwell MC; Department of Ophthalmology, San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium, TX, USA.
  • Gensheimer WG; White River Junction Veterans Administration Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, USA; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
  • Williamson TH; Department of Engineering and Biological Sciences, University of Surrey, Surrey, UK; Department of Ophthalmology, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
  • Dhawahir-Scala F; Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, UK.
  • Shah P; Birmingham Institute for Glaucoma Research, Birmingham, UK; Ophthalmology Department, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
  • Coombes A; Department of Ophthalmology, The Royal London Hospital, London, UK.
  • Sundar G; Department of Ophthalmology, National University Hospital, Singapore.
  • Mazzoli RA; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, MD, USA.
  • Woodcock M; Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, UK.
  • Watson SL; Save Sight Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Kuhn F; Helen Keller Foundation for Research and Education, AL, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.
  • Colyer M; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, MD, USA.
  • Gomes RS; BRAVO VICTOR, London, UK; Northern Hub for Veterans and Military Families Research, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK.
  • Blanch RJ; Neuroscience and Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Ophthalmology Department, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Academic Department of Military Surgery and Trauma, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmi
Ophthalmology ; 2024 Aug 30.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39218161
ABSTRACT
TOPIC The timing of primary repair of open-globe injury is variable in major trauma centres around the world and there is a lack of consensus on optimal timing. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Surgery is the mainstay of open-globe injury management, and appropriate timing of surgical repair may minimise the risk of potentially blinding complications such as endophthalmitis, thereby optimising visual outcomes.

METHODS:

A systematic literature review was performed following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration number CRD42023442972). CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, ISRCTN registry and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to 29 October 2023. Prospective and retrospective non-randomised studies of patients with open-globe injury with a minimum of one month follow up after primary repair were included. Primary outcomes included visual acuity at last follow-up, and the proportion of patients who developed endophthalmitis. Certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) approach.

RESULTS:

A total of 16 studies met inclusion criteria, reporting a total of 8497 eyes. The most common injury types were penetrating and intraocular foreign body (IOFB). Meta-analysis found that primary repair less than 24 hours after open-globe injury was associated with an odds of endophthalmitis of 0.30 compared to primary repair conducted more than 24 hours after trauma (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.19-0.79; I2 95%; p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in reported visual outcomes between patients whose open-globe injuries were repaired more than, compared to less than, 24 hours after trauma (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.61-1.29; I2 70%; p = 0.52). All included studies were retrospective and non-randomised, demonstrating an overall low certainty of evidence on GRADE assessment.

CONCLUSION:

Only retrospective data exist around the effect of timing of open-globe repair, causing low certainty of the available evidence. However, this review of the current body of evidence, predominantly including penetrating and IOFB injuries, suggests that primary repair performed less than 24 hours after open-globe injury was associated with a reduced endophthalmitis rate, compared to longer delays, consistent with delay to primary repair increasing endophthalmitis risk.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ophthalmology Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ophthalmology Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos