Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Not "that kind" of doctor: an exploratory study on Doctor of Physical Therapy-patient introductions in the United States.
Martino, Justin; Smoliga, James M; Mabry, Lance.
Afiliación
  • Martino J; Department of Physical Therapy, High Point University, High Point, NC, USA.
  • Smoliga JM; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Mabry L; Department of Physical Therapy, High Point University, High Point, NC, USA.
J Man Manip Ther ; : 1-10, 2024 Aug 31.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39215965
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This exploratory study examined the prevalence and determinants of the use of the title 'doctor' among the United States (U.S.) licensed Doctors of Physical Therapy (DPTs) during patient-provider introductions.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional analysis of DPTs across eight states was conducted. Binary logistic regression analyzed demographic and experience-related factors influencing title use, including years of experience, board certification status, and clinical instructor (CI) experience. Stepwise logistic regression with forward selection identified significant predictors. Beliefs influencing title use were evaluated through descriptive statistics from multiple choice questions with an option for open-ended responses for additional opinions.

RESULTS:

Of the 1,311 participants who met the inclusion criteria, 19.9% reported using 'doctor' during patient-provider introductions. The odds of using the title increased with age and was higher among males, with age controlled for. Completion of a residency program and not being a CI were also associated with greater odds of title use, with age and sex controlled for. Beliefs about demonstrating expertise, having earned the title, and advancing the profession were primary reasons for using the title, while concerns about patient confusion and therapeutic alliance were reasons for not using it. Both DPTs who did and did not report using the title 'doctor' commonly cited the impact on therapeutic alliance as justification.

CONCLUSIONS:

A minority of our sample of U.S. DPTs use the title 'doctor' during patient-provider introductions, with significant variation across age, gender, and professional experience. Deciding whether to use the title was primarily based on their perceived effects on patient beliefs.

DISCUSSION:

This is the first study to formally investigate how DPTs refer to themselves during patient-provider introductions. Understanding title use in healthcare can inform best practices during patient interactions. This study provides a foundation for future research on the impact of DPTs mentioning their doctoral title on patient experiences and outcomes.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Man Manip Ther Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Man Manip Ther Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido