Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Why are we doing this Staff? Justification and implications of aerobic fitness testing in the military.
Keaney, Lauren; Kilding, Andrew; Fordy, Graham; Kilding, Helen.
Afiliación
  • Keaney L; Human Sciences, Defence Science & Technology, New Zealand Defence Force, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Kilding A; Sports Performance Research Institute New Zealand, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Fordy G; Australian Defence Apparel (ADA) New Zealand Ltd.
  • Kilding H; Sports Performance Research Institute New Zealand, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Work ; 2024 Aug 28.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39213123
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Physical fitness is a key tenet of military organisations worldwide. Specifically, many consider aerobic fitness (AF) an essential physical attribute for ensuring optimal military performance and readiness. However, the intricate relationship between AF and various facets of military job performance necessitates comprehensive review to ascertain the appropriateness and effectiveness of its assessment.

OBJECTIVE:

This narrative review aims to describe the relationship between AF and factors influencing individual military performance and readiness, and explores the implications of the enforcement of in-service, generic AF test standards in military populations.

METHODS:

Databases (PubMed and Google Scholar) were searched for all relevant published peer-reviewed literature as at August 2023.

RESULTS:

Inconsistent associations were found between AF and outcomes influencing individual military performance (physical capabilities, cognitive capabilities, presenteeism and productivity, resilience, and technical/tactical capabilities) and readiness (mental health and wellbeing and physical health). Consequently, the level of AF needed for acceptable or optimal military performance remains uncertain.

CONCLUSIONS:

AF is a cornerstone of health and performance, yet linking generic AF test standards to job performance is complex, with multiple factors interacting to influence outcomes. From existing literatures, there does not appear to be a specific level of AF at, and/or above, which acceptable military performance is achieved. As such, the enforcement of and emphasis on in-service, pass/fail, generic AF test standards in military populations is questionable and requires thoughtful re-evaluation. Role/task-specific AF should be assessed through evidence-based PES and the use of generic AF tests limited to the monitoring and benchmarking of health-related fitness.
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Work Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA OCUPACIONAL Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Nueva Zelanda Pais de publicación: Países Bajos
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Work Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA OCUPACIONAL Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Nueva Zelanda Pais de publicación: Países Bajos