Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of Local Wound Infiltration Post-Mastectomy Using Bupivacaine Alone, Bupivacaine With Ketamine, and Bupivacaine With Dexmedetomidine: A Randomized Double-Blind Study.
Raj, Priyanka; Sinha, Nitesh; Kharwar, Ramesh K; Singh, Dipali; Kumar, Sourabh; Priye, Shio; Prakash, Jay.
Afiliación
  • Raj P; Department of Anesthesiology, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Ranchi, IND.
  • Sinha N; Department of Anesthesiology, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Ranchi, IND.
  • Kharwar RK; Department of Anesthesiology, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Ranchi, IND.
  • Singh D; Department of Anesthesiology, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Ranchi, IND.
  • Kumar S; Department of Anesthesiology, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Ranchi, IND.
  • Priye S; Department of Anesthesiology, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Ranchi, IND.
  • Prakash J; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Ranchi, IND.
Cureus ; 16(7): e65727, 2024 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39211679
ABSTRACT
Background and aim While the infiltration of surgical incisions with local anesthetics is not a new practice, it remains a crucial component of contemporary multimodal analgesia protocols. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using adjuvants in combination with local anesthetic wound infiltration for pain management in patients undergoing mastectomy surgery. Methods Eighty-one patients aged 18-60 years, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I or II, were scheduled for unilateral mastectomy and randomly assigned to three groups of 27 each. The groups were designated as Group C (bupivacaine alone), Group D (bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine), and Group K (bupivacaine with ketamine). Group C received 0.25% bupivacaine alone, Group D received 0.25% bupivacaine with 1 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine, and Group K received 0.25% bupivacaine with 1 mg/kg ketamine. The time to achieve a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of 3 following local wound infiltration was recorded for each group. Additionally, total postoperative fentanyl intake during the first 24 hours, as measured by the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump, was compared among the groups. Sedation levels were assessed using the Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS). Data were analyzed using the Chi-Square test and one-way ANOVA in IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0 (Released 2021; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results Demographic factors were similar across the three groups. Analysis of the VAS scores revealed that the ketamine group provided better postoperative pain control than the dexmedetomidine group (p < 0.001). Groups D (71.72 ± 71.73) and K (3.53 ± 13.42) had significantly lower 24-hour fentanyl intake (in mcg) compared to Group C (the control group), as measured by PCA. Additionally, Group C had a significantly lower RSS at the sixth hour (p = 0.003) compared to both Groups D and K. Conclusion Ketamine, when used as an adjuvant to bupivacaine for local infiltration, enhances the effectiveness and prolongs postoperative analgesia more effectively than dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing mastectomy.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos