The existence of manual mode increases human blame for AI mistakes.
Cognition
; 252: 105931, 2024 Nov.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-39208639
ABSTRACT
People are offloading many tasks to artificial intelligence (AI)-including driving, investing decisions, and medical choices-but it is human nature to want to maintain ultimate control. So even when using autonomous machines, people want a "manual mode", an option that shifts control back to themselves. Unfortunately, the mere existence of manual mode leads to more human blame when AI makes mistakes. When observers know that a human agent theoretically had the option to take control, the humans are assigned more responsibility, even when agents lack the time or ability to actually exert control, as with self-driving car crashes. Four experiments reveal that though people prefer having a manual mode, even if the AI mode is more efficient and adding the manual mode is more expensive (Study 1), the existence of a manual mode increases human blame (Studies 2a-3c). We examine two mediators for this effect increased perceptions of causation and counterfactual cognition (Study 4). The results suggest that the human thirst for illusory control comes with real costs. Implications of AI decision-making are discussed.
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Inteligencia Artificial
Límite:
Adult
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Cognition
Año:
2024
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
Noruega
Pais de publicación:
Países Bajos