Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comparison of the safety and efficacy of tapinarof and roflumilast topical therapies in the management of mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis.
Ghani, Hira; Podwojniak, Alicia; Tan, Isabella J; Parikh, Aarushi K; Sanabria, Bianca; Rao, Babar.
Afiliación
  • Ghani H; Dermatology Clinical Trials Unit, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Podwojniak A; Rowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, New Jersey, USA.
  • Tan IJ; Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
  • Parikh AK; Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
  • Sanabria B; Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
  • Rao B; Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Skin Res Technol ; 30(9): e70041, 2024 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39206797
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Psoriasis is an immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease. First-line topical treatments include steroids, calcineurin inhibitors, vitamin D analogs, and anthralin. Recently, novel topical therapeutics like tapinarof and roflumilast have emerged with unique anti-inflammatory mechanisms and promising efficacy profiles. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

This review utilized PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases to identify recent studies on tapinarof and roflumilast. Criteria focused on efficacy, safety profiles, and therapeutic roles in psoriasis treatment.

RESULTS:

Four primary literature articles were identified for tapinarof and five for roflumilast. Both drugs demonstrated strong efficacy with minimal adverse events in treating mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis. Tapinarof showed more frequent but mild adverse effects, while roflumilast had less frequent but more severe side effects.

DISCUSSION:

Tapinarof and roflumilast offer once-daily dosing and successful treatment in restricted areas, potentially enhancing patient adherence. Cost remains a limiting factor, necessitating future comparative studies to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness between the two drugs.

CONCLUSION:

Tapinarof and roflumilast present promising topical treatments for psoriasis, showing efficacy and manageable safety profiles. Further research is crucial to fully elucidate their comparative benefits and drawbacks in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Psoriasis / Benzamidas / Ciclopropanos / Aminopiridinas Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Skin Res Technol Asunto de la revista: DERMATOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Psoriasis / Benzamidas / Ciclopropanos / Aminopiridinas Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Skin Res Technol Asunto de la revista: DERMATOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido