Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) protocols do not further increase jumping performance beyond warm-up effects: findings from three acute randomized crossover trials.
Rappelt, Ludwig; Held, Steffen; Wiedenmann, Tim; Micke, Florian; Donath, Lars.
Afiliación
  • Rappelt L; Department of Intervention Research in Exercise Training, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Held S; Department of Movement and Training Science, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.
  • Wiedenmann T; Department of Intervention Research in Exercise Training, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Micke F; Department of Sport and Management, IST University of Applied Sciences, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Donath L; Department of Intervention Research in Exercise Training, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Front Physiol ; 15: 1447421, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39206386
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) cannot be clearly distinguished from and may be explained in large by warm-up effects. To disentangle PAPE from a systemic warm-up effect, we conducted three randomized crossover trials (RCT).

Methods:

Each RCT consisted of a familiarization/one-repetition-maximum (1RM) assessment session followed by two interventional sessions (random order). In Study I, 18 participants (age 26 ± 4 years; height 1.84 ± 0.06 m; mass 83.7 ± 8.7 kg; Squat-1RM 146 ± 19 kg) performed either a 3-s isometric squat at 130%1RM or a 6-s isometric squat at 65%1RM. In Study II, 28 participants (11 female; age 23 ± 3 years; height 1.77 ± 0.08 m; mass 76.5 ± 10.4 kg; Squat-1RM 109 ± 38 kg) completed either Squat (3 × 3 repetitions, 85%1RM) or local electromyostimulation of the quadriceps muscle (85% of individual pain threshold). In Study III, 20 participants (6 female, age 25.0 ± 3.5 years, mass 78.5 ± 15.8 kg, height 1.75 ± 0.08 m; SQ-1RM 114 ± 33 kg, chest-press-1RM 74 ± 29 kg) performed either squats or chest press (4 repetitions, 80%1RM). Counter-Movement-Jump height (CMJ) was assessed after a general (PRE) and/or muscle-specific warm-up (POST_WU) and for up to 11 min after the PAPE protocols. To identify possible differences in CMJ between the experimental conditions, mixed-design ANOVA models were used for each study individually, with condition and time modelled as fixed effects, while participants were included as a random effect blocking factor. The level of statistical significance was set at α = 5%.

Results:

In studies I and II, significant effects for time (p < 0.05, ωp 2 = 0.06 and p < 0.001, ωp 2 = 0.43) were found with the highest CMJ compared to all other time points at PRE (≤8.2 ± 4.6%, standardized mean difference ≤0.39), regardless of condition. In study III, no significant effects were observed.

Discussion:

Thus, PAPE protocols do not further improve jumping performance compared to a general and muscle-specific traditional warm-up. Prior to tasks requiring explosive strength, general and sport-specific warm-up strategies should be used.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Physiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania Pais de publicación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Physiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania Pais de publicación: Suiza