Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intra-arterial nicardipine versus verapamil during transradial access coronary catheterization.
Patel, Keshav; Duckett, Melissa; Vidovich, Mladen I; Ibrahim, Khalil.
Afiliación
  • Patel K; Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America. Electronic address: patelkeshav705@gmail.com.
  • Duckett M; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America. Electronic address: mduckett@uic.edu.
  • Vidovich MI; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America. Electronic address: miv@uic.edu.
  • Ibrahim K; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America. Electronic address: khalil8@uic.edu.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39191616
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Intra-arterial (IA) vasodilators are recommended during transradial access (TRA) to prevent radial artery spasm (RAS). The American Heart Association (AHA) recommends either IA verapamil, diltiazem, nicardipine, or nitroglycerin to prevent RAS. To our knowledge, the efficacy of RAS prevention and patient tolerability of verapamil and nicardipine has not been directly compared in a randomized fashion.

METHODS:

We conducted a prospective, single-blinded randomized clinical trial comparing the discomfort experienced by patients receiving either 400 µg of IA nicardipine (n = 26) or 5 mg of IA verapamil (n = 29). Patient discomfort and/or pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) both before and after IA administration of nicardipine or verapamil.

RESULTS:

There was a statistically significant difference in mean change in VAS scores between the 2 groups, with an average increase in VAS score of 0.88 in the nicardipine group and 4.81 in the verapamil group (p < 0.0001). The overall rate of RAS was low in our study (5.5 %) with no significant difference in RAS incidence between the 2 groups (p = 0.465). The nicardipine group had 2 RAS cases (7.7 %), with 1 requiring a change in strategy (3.8 %). The verapamil group had 1 RAS case (3.4 %) that did not require a change in strategy.

CONCLUSION:

In this trial, we showed that nicardipine causes significantly less discomfort and pain compared to verapamil during IA administration for TRA cardiac catheterization.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cardiovasc Revasc Med Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cardiovasc Revasc Med Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos