Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of Self-collected Saliva Samples Without Viral Transport Media for SARS-CoV-2 Testing via RT-PCR and Comparison of Amplicon Sequences Against Commonly Used Primers in Diagnostic Assays.
Ramos, Benjamin D; Hudson, N Ryan; Gonzales, Diane E; Brown, Ashleigh N; White, Matthew G; Browde, Ryan J; McNeary-Garvin, Antoinette M; Knight, Celynn E; Pham, Kevin C; Sweatt, Robert J; Phan, Liem Minh; Ly, Eileen; Garcia, Andrew R.
Afiliación
  • Ramos BD; Department of Pathology, 60th Medical Group (MDG), Travis Air Force Base (AFB), Fairfield, CA 94535, USA.
  • Hudson NR; Clinical Investigation Facility, 60MDG, Fairfield, CA 94535, USA.
  • Gonzales DE; Clinical Investigation Facility, 60MDG, Fairfield, CA 94535, USA.
  • Brown AN; Clinical Investigation Facility, 60MDG, Fairfield, CA 94535, USA.
  • White MG; Clinical Investigation Facility, 60MDG, Fairfield, CA 94535, USA.
  • Browde RJ; Clinical Investigation Facility, 60MDG, Fairfield, CA 94535, USA.
  • McNeary-Garvin AM; Clinical Investigation Facility, 60MDG, Fairfield, CA 94535, USA.
  • Knight CE; Clinical Investigation Facility, 60MDG, Fairfield, CA 94535, USA.
  • Pham KC; Clinical Investigation Facility, 60MDG, Fairfield, CA 94535, USA.
  • Sweatt RJ; Clinical Investigation Facility, 60MDG, Fairfield, CA 94535, USA.
  • Phan LM; Clinical Investigation Facility, 60MDG, Fairfield, CA 94535, USA.
  • Ly E; Clinical Investigation Facility, 60MDG, Fairfield, CA 94535, USA.
  • Garcia AR; Clinical Investigation Facility, 60MDG, Fairfield, CA 94535, USA.
Mil Med ; 189(Supplement_3): 184-189, 2024 Aug 19.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39160794
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Mass screening for SARS-CoV-2 using nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) is costly, uncomfortable for patients, and increases the chance of virus exposure to health care workers. Therefore, this study focused on determining if self-collected unpreserved saliva can be an effective alternative to NPS collection in COVID-19 surveillance. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

In this study, patients being tested for SARS-CoV-2 using NPS were asked to provide a saliva sample to compare their results. NPS samples were evaluated for SARS-CoV-2 using BioFire® FilmArray® Torch® or Cepheid® GeneXpert® systems while saliva samples were evaluated using an in-house developed reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) which targeted the Envelope (E) and Nucleocapsid (N) genes.

RESULTS:

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 using self-collected saliva was found to be only slightly less accurate (<5%) than testing using NPS. In addition, initial saliva RT-PCR identified 27 positive subjects, 18 of which provided amplicons sufficient for confirmatory sequencing. The sequencing data showed a genetic shift in the virus within our population sometime between 22 June and July 8, 2021 from Alpha to Delta variant.

CONCLUSIONS:

The saliva sample collection method identifies the E gene in SARS COVID-2 samples which provides an alternative specimen source to the NPS. This identifies the S gene and ORF1ab. Saliva collection is more convenient to the patient, yields comparable results to NPS collection, and potentially increases Covid-19 surveillance.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Saliva / Manejo de Especímenes / Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Mil Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Saliva / Manejo de Especímenes / Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Mil Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido