Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prioritising nurses' and doctors' health at work: a scoping review of monitoring instruments.
Boskma, Amber; Braak, Kim; Demenaga, Kiki; Idema, Demy; Hooft, Lotty; Wietasch, Götz; Franx, Arie; van der Laan, Maarten J.
Afiliación
  • Boskma A; Netherlands Federation of University Medical Centers, Utrecht, Netherlands a.c.p.boskma@umcg.nl.
  • Braak K; Cochrane Netherlands, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
  • Demenaga K; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
  • Idema D; Cochrane Netherlands, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
  • Hooft L; Department of Intensive Care, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
  • Wietasch G; Cochrane Netherlands, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
  • Franx A; Cochrane Netherlands, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
  • van der Laan MJ; Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
BMJ Open ; 14(8): e079861, 2024 Aug 17.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39153793
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Nurses' and doctors' health at work is crucial for their overall performance and the quality of care they provide. The Jobs Demands Resources (JD-R) model offers a framework for health at work, encompassing 'job demands', 'job resources', 'personal resources', 'leadership', 'well-being' and 'outcomes'. While various instruments exist to measure health, an overview of instruments specifically designed for assessing nurses and doctors health is currently missing. This study provides a comprehensive overview of available health instruments specifically developed and validated for healthcare professionals in hospital care.

DESIGN:

Scoping review. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Studies assessing the health of nurses and/or doctors in hospitals using or evaluating instruments based on the JD-R model, published between January 2011 and January 2024, excluding student-exclusive samples. DATA EXTRACTION AND

SYNTHESIS:

We extracted data on study and sample characteristics, as well as details of the measurement instruments, including main and subconstructs. Instruments were categorised based on the JD-R model domains. Descriptive analysis and data visualisation were performed using Excel and Python.

RESULTS:

We included 1204 studies, reporting 986 unique instruments. We identified 32 comprehensive instruments suitable for broad health screening, measuring four or more of the JD-R model domains. Additionally, we identified instruments focusing on specific domains for targeted screening needs. Furthermore, we present frequently reported instruments assumed to be extensively evaluated, user-friendly, accessible and available in multiple languages.

CONCLUSIONS:

Health at work cannot be determined by a single instrument alone, underscoring the multidimensional nature of workplace health. Alternatively, organisations should select instruments based on domains most relevant and applicable to their context. This approach ensures a more comprehensive assessment of health at work.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido