Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A mixed methods, longitudinal study: characterizing the differences in engagement and perceived learning of medical students in online and in-person team-based learning classes.
Lee, Irene Cheng Jie; Wong, Peiyan.
Afiliación
  • Lee ICJ; MD Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
  • Wong P; MD Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
MedEdPublish (2016) ; 13: 33, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39139988
ABSTRACT

Background:

The rapid transition to online delivery of medical curriculum has facilitated the continuation of medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Whilst active learning approaches, including Team-Based Learning (TBL), are generally more supportive of the learner's needs during such transition, it remains elusive how different learning environments affect a learner's motivation, engagement, and perceived learning over a prolonged period. We leveraged on Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and key learners' characteristics to explore the levels of student's engagement and perceived learning in two TBL learning environments, online and in-person, over an extended period. We hypothesize that students' self-reported perceptions of engagement and learning will be lower in online compared to in-person TBL classes.

Methods:

This is a mixed methods study with 49 preclinical graduate medical students completing the same questionnaire twice for each learning environment, online TBL and in-person TBL, over an eight-month period. Quantitative data were collected on learners' characteristics, basic psychological needs satisfaction, motivation, student's engagement and perceived learning. The final questionnaire also explored participants' perception on which learning environment better supported their learning.

Results:

We found that autonomy support, perceived competence and needs satisfaction, and perceived learning were higher in-person than online. Additionally, most learners felt that in-person TBL was better for learning, as the concepts of learning space and the community of practice were mediated by being in-person.

Conclusions:

TBL, being an active instructional method, can maintain students' engagement because it supports many aspects of SDT constructs and perceived learning. However, online TBL is unable to fully support the students' needs and perceived learning. Hence, we strongly advocate for any in-person opportunities to be included in a course, as in-person classes best supports students' engagement and perceived learning.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: MedEdPublish (2016) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Singapur Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: MedEdPublish (2016) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Singapur Pais de publicación: Reino Unido