Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Regional variation in health care substitution for intrauterine device insertion: a retrospective cohort study.
Vink, Maarten D; Portrait, France R; van Wezep, Tim; Koolman, Xander; Mol, Ben W; van der Hijden, Eric J.
Afiliación
  • Vink MD; Department of Health Economics, School of Business and Economics &, Talma Institute, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. mdhvink@gmail.com.
  • Portrait FR; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, The Netherlands. mdhvink@gmail.com.
  • van Wezep T; Department of Health Economics, School of Business and Economics &, Talma Institute, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Koolman X; Vektis, Sparrenheuvel 18, 3708 JE, Zeist, The Netherlands.
  • Mol BW; Department of Health Economics, School of Business and Economics &, Talma Institute, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van der Hijden EJ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton , Victoria, 3168, Australia.
BMC Prim Care ; 25(1): 294, 2024 Aug 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39127618
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Rising health care costs are a major concern in most Western countries. The substitution of healthcare stands as a strategic approach aimed at mitigating costs while offering medical services in proximity to patients' residences. An illustrative instance involves the migration of outpatient hospital care to primary care settings. Notably, the insertion of intrauterine devices (IUDs) can be safely executed within primary care contexts. In order to establish a pragmatic objective for the rate of IUD substitution, we conducted an evaluation of regional disparities in healthcare substitution pertaining to the insertion of intrauterine devices. Furthermore, we investigated disparities in the follow-up ultrasound and reinsertion of IUDs between primary and secondary healthcare environments.

METHODS:

All women who underwent IUD insertion in Dutch primary care (by general practitioners and midwives) and secondary care (by hospital physicians) between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020 were included. The main outcome measures were the case-mix adjusted IUD insertion rates at the regional level by care setting and the proportions requiring follow-up ultrasound and IUD reinsertion within three months.

RESULTS:

Of the 840,766 IUD placements, 74% were inserted in primary care and 26% in secondary care. The proportion inserted in primary care increased from 70% in 2016 to 77% in 2020. The observed substitution rate ranged from 58 to 82% between regions. Compared with health care professionals in primary care, those in secondary care performed more ultrasounds to verify IUD placement (23% vs. 3%; p-value < 0.01) and more IUD reinsertions within three months (6% vs. 2%; p-value < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

IUDs are increasingly being inserted in Dutch primary care, with peak regional IUD insertion care substitution rates at ≥ 80%. IUD insertion care substitution to primary care appears to be associated with significantly fewer women having follow-up ultrasound or IUD reinsertion within three months.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención Primaria de Salud / Dispositivos Intrauterinos Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Prim Care Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención Primaria de Salud / Dispositivos Intrauterinos Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Prim Care Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido