Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Task-specific relationships between error-related ERPs and behavior: Flanker, Stroop, and Go/Nogo tasks.
Park, Bohyun; Holbrook, Amanda; Lutz, Miranda C; Baldwin, Scott A; Larson, Michael J; Clayson, Peter E.
Afiliación
  • Park B; Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
  • Holbrook A; Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
  • Lutz MC; Department of Psychology, Education & Child Studies, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Baldwin SA; Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA; Neuroscience Center, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.
  • Larson MJ; Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA; Neuroscience Center, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.
  • Clayson PE; Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA. Electronic address: clayson@usf.edu.
Int J Psychophysiol ; 204: 112409, 2024 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39121995
ABSTRACT
Performance monitoring has been widely studied during different forced-choice response tasks. Participants typically show longer response times (RTs) and increased accuracy following errors, but there are inconsistencies regarding the connection between error-related event-related brain potentials (ERPs) and behavior, such as RT and accuracy. The specific task in any given study could contribute to these inconsistencies, as different tasks may require distinct cognitive processes that impact ERP-behavior relationships. The present study sought to determine whether task moderates ERP-behavior relationships and whether these relationships are robustly observed when tasks and stimuli are treated as random effects. ERPs and behavioral indices (RTs and accuracy) recorded during flanker, Stroop, and Go/Nogo tasks from 180 people demonstrated a task-specific effect on ERP-behavior relationships, such that larger previous-trial error-related negativity (ERN) predicted longer RTs and greater likelihood of a correct response on subsequent trials during flanker and Stroop tasks but not during Go/Nogo task. Additionally, larger previous-trial error positivity (Pe) predicted faster RTs and smaller variances of RTs on subsequent trials for Stroop and Go/Nogo tasks but not for flanker task. When tasks and stimuli were treated as random effects, ERP-behavior relationships were not observed. These findings support the need to consider the task used for recording performance monitoring measures when interpreting results across studies.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Desempeño Psicomotor / Tiempo de Reacción / Electroencefalografía / Potenciales Evocados / Test de Stroop Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Int J Psychophysiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Países Bajos
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Desempeño Psicomotor / Tiempo de Reacción / Electroencefalografía / Potenciales Evocados / Test de Stroop Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Int J Psychophysiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Países Bajos