Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Muscle quality index comparisons between Hispanics and non-Hispanic Caucasians using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and handgrip strength.
Mehra, Ayush; Snarr, Ronald L; Park, Kyung-Shin; Krok-Schoen, Jessica L; Czerwinski, Stefan A; Nickerson, Brett S.
Afiliación
  • Mehra A; School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Snarr RL; Department of Kinesiology, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX, USA.
  • Park KS; College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Texas A&M International University, Laredo, TX, USA.
  • Krok-Schoen JL; School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Czerwinski SA; School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Nickerson BS; School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. brett.nickerson@osumc.edu.
Eur J Clin Nutr ; 2024 Aug 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39117905
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND &

AIMS:

Muscle quality index (MQI) can be computed in various ways. Also, many studies have evaluated MQI in older adults and non-Hispanic populations. The aim of this study was to compare various muscle quality indexes between Hispanics and non-Hispanic Caucasians when stratifying grip strength and appendicular lean mass measurements.

METHODS:

235 participants (aged 25.5 ± 9.5 for males and 26.4 ± 9.9 for females) completed a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan to assess appendicular lean mass (ALM). Handgrip strength (HGS) was assessed using a handheld dynamometer. MQI was computed using four different models 1). MQIRA ALM and HGS of right arm and hand, respectively; 2). MQILA ALM and HGS of left arm and hand, respectively; 3). MQIARMS ALM and HGS of both arms and hands, respectively; and 4). MQITOTAL ALM of upper and lower-limbs and HGS of left and right hand.

RESULTS:

Hispanic males and females exhibited lower HGS compared to Caucasians with effect sizes ranging from trivial (d = 0.17) to moderate (d = 0.80). Females demonstrated higher MQI values compared to males for MQIARMS (d = 0.70), MQIRA (d = 0.75), and MQILA (d = 0.57). However, MQITOTAL yielded a small practical effect (d = 0.33) in favor of males (3.2 ± 0.5 kg/kg vs. 3.1 ± 0.5 kg/kg). After factoring by sex and ethnicity, Hispanic males and females, compared to non-Hispanic Caucasians males and females, showed trivial-to-small practical differences (d values ranging from 0.03 to 0.39).

CONCLUSIONS:

These results demonstrate MQI models vary across sex, particularly when utilizing models that account for upper extremity strength and ALM (i.e., MQIARMS, MQIRA, and MQILA). Lastly, to establish consistency in future research, the present study recommends using MQI models that account for ALM of upper- and lower-limbs (i.e., MQITOTAL). However, research measuring muscular strength via one upper-limb (e.g., left hand) might consider measuring ALM of the corresponding arm (e.g., left arm) when computing muscle quality (e.g., MQILA).

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Clin Nutr Asunto de la revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Clin Nutr Asunto de la revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido