Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Radiological signs of stone impaction add no value in predicting spontaneous stone passage.
Popiolek, Marcin; Lidén, Mats; Georgouleas, Petros; Sahlén, Klara; Sundqvist, Pernilla; Jendeberg, Johan.
Afiliación
  • Popiolek M; Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 701 85, Örebro, Sweden. marcin.popiolek@regionorebrolan.se.
  • Lidén M; Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
  • Georgouleas P; Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 701 85, Örebro, Sweden.
  • Sahlén K; Department of Surgical Sciences, Radiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Sundqvist P; Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 701 85, Örebro, Sweden.
  • Jendeberg J; Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Urolithiasis ; 52(1): 114, 2024 Aug 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39105826
ABSTRACT
Stone size and location are key factors in predicting spontaneous stone passage (SSP), but little attention has been paid to the influence of radiological signs of stone impaction (RSSI). This research aims to determine whether RSSI, alongside stone size, can predict SSP and to evaluate the consistency of ureteral wall thickness (UWT) measurements among observers. In this retrospective study, 160 patients with a single upper or middle ureteral stone on acute non-enhanced computed tomography (NCCT) were analysed. Patient data were collected from medical records. Measurements of RSSI, including UWT, ureteral diameters, and average attenuation above and below the stone, were taken on NCCT by four independent readers blind to the outcomes. The cohort consisted of 70% males with an average age of 51 ± 15. SSP occurred in 61% of patients over 20 weeks. The median stone length was 5.7 mm (IQR 4.5-7.3) and was significantly shorter in patients who passed their stones at short- (4.6 vs. 7.1, p < 0.001) and long-term (4.8 vs. 7.1, p < 0.001) follow-up. For stone length, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for predicting SSP was 0.90 (CI 0.84-0.96) and only increased to 0.91 (CI 0.85-0.95) when adding ureteral diameters and UWT. Ureteral attenuation did not predict SSP (AUC < 0.5). Interobserver variability for UWT was moderate, with ± 2.0 mm multi-reader limits of agreement (LOA). The results suggest that RSSI do not enhance the predictive value of stone size for SSP. UWT measurements exhibit moderate reliability with significant interobserver variability.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cálculos Ureterales / Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Urolithiasis Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia Pais de publicación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cálculos Ureterales / Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Urolithiasis Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia Pais de publicación: Alemania