Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bivalirudin Versus Heparin Monotherapy in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Study-level Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Sun, Bing; Chen, Rui Rui.
Afiliación
  • Sun B; Department of Cardiology, Tang Du Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Shaanxi, China.
  • Chen RR; Department of Cardiology, Tang Du Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Shaanxi, China. ruirui317@163.com.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39080125
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

The present meta-analysis focused on investigating whether bivalirudin plus post-PCI infusion was safer and more effective than heparin monotherapy in patients who developed ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS:

The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systemically searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing bivalirudin and heparin for treating STEMI patients who underwent primary PCI. The Cochrane quality assessment tool was used to assess the quality of the enrolled studies. The primary and secondary outcomes included net adverse clinical events (NACEs, comprising all-cause death or major bleeding), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs, comprising all-cause death, stroke, MI, and TVR), in-stent thrombosis (IST), and bleeding of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 2, 3, and 5.

RESULTS:

The four RCTs, comprising 10,695 events, included 5350 patients who received bivalirudin combined with post-PCI infusion and 5345 patients who received heparin monotherapy. Compared with those in the heparin group, the number of NACEs (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.96, P = 0.009), MACEs (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.67-0.99, P = 0.04), and ISTs (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49-0.91, P < 0.0001) in the bivalirudin group was significantly lower. There were no significant differences in all-cause death, cardiac death, stroke, MI, TVR, or BARC type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding between the two groups.

CONCLUSION:

In STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, bivalirudin plus post-PCI infusion significantly reduced the incidence of NACEs, MACEs, and ISTs compared with heparin monotherapy, without increasing the risk of MI or TVR. Bivalirudin may also contribute to a potential reduction in stroke, death, and BARC type 2, 3, and 5 bleeding rates.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cardiovasc Drugs Ther Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / TERAPIA POR MEDICAMENTOS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cardiovasc Drugs Ther Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / TERAPIA POR MEDICAMENTOS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos