Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Oral Health Assessment in Cleft Lip & Palate Patients During Orthodontic Treatment for Maxillary Protraction: A Periodontal & Microbiological Study.
Gupta Batra, Shweta; Khatri, Manish; Bansal, Mansi; Batra, Puneet; Khatri, Ayush; Bint Aziz, Sana.
Afiliación
  • Gupta Batra S; Department of Periodontology, Institute of Dental Studies & Technologies, Modinagar, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Khatri M; Department of Periodontology, Institute of Dental Studies & Technologies, Modinagar, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Bansal M; Department of Periodontology, Institute of Dental Studies & Technologies, Modinagar, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Batra P; Department of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Manav Rachna Dental College, School of Dental Sciences, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research & Studies, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
  • Khatri A; Department of Periodontology, Institute of Dental Studies & Technologies, Modinagar, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Bint Aziz S; Department of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Manav Rachna Dental College, School of Dental Sciences, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research & Studies, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J ; : 10556656241263442, 2024 Jul 21.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39033436
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the oral health status and microbiota of subgingival plaque in patients with surgically repaired cleft lip and palate (CLP) during orthodontic treatment for maxillary protraction with two different orthodontic appliances.

DESIGN:

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING:

Institutional.

PARTICIPANTS:

A total of 90 patients with surgically repaired Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate, out of initially enrolled 120 patients, were divided into 3 groups experimental group I, experimental group II and control group, with 30 subjects each. Patients with a history of oral prophylaxis in last 6 months or antibiotic therapy within 3 months were excluded from the study.

INTERVENTIONS:

Bone Anchored Maxillary Protraction was done in experimental group I, while facemask with acrylic occlusal splint was used for maxillary protraction in experimental group II and no orthodontic intervention in control group. MEAN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI), Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI), Probing Depth (PD), and microbiota of subgingival plaque (P. gingivalis, P. intermedia, Veillonella and Capnocytophaga) were compared at baseline (T0) and after 8 months (T1).

RESULTS:

The PI, GI, GBI and PD were observed to be significantly higher in experimental group II followed by experimental group I as compared to control group at 8 months interval (P < .001). The microbiota counts increased significantly in experimental group II and experimental group I (P < .001), as compared to control group.

CONCLUSION:

Maxillary protraction with facemask and bone plates was found to be a better alternative than facemask with occlusal splint, considering the overall oral health of patients with CLP.
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cleft Palate Craniofac J Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cleft Palate Craniofac J Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos