Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Schoolhouse risk: Can we mitigate the polygenic Pygmalion effect?
Matthews, Lucas J; Zhang, Zhijun; Martschenko, Daphne O.
Afiliación
  • Matthews LJ; Columbia University, Department of Medical Humanities & Ethics, New York, NY, United States; The Hastings Center, New York, NY, United States. Electronic address: ljm2189@cumc.columbia.edu.
  • Zhang Z; New York State Psychiatric Institute, Department of Mental Health and Data Science, New York, NY, United States. Electronic address: lydia.zhang@nyspi.columbia.edu.
  • Martschenko DO; Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics and Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University; Stanford, CA, United States. Electronic address: daphnem@stanford.edu.
Acta Psychol (Amst) ; 248: 104403, 2024 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39003994
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Although limited in predictive accuracy, polygenic scores (PGS) for educational outcomes are currently available to the public via direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies. Further, there is a growing movement to apply PGS in educational settings via 'precision education.' Prior scholarship highlights the potentially negative impacts of such applications, as disappointing results may give rise a "polygenic Pygmalion effect." In this paper two studies were conducted to identify factors that may mitigate or exacerbate negative impacts of PGS.

METHODS:

Two studies were conducted. In each, 1188 students were randomized to one of four conditions Low-percentile polygenic score for educational attainment (EA-PGS), Low EA-PGS + Mitigating information, Low EA-PGS + Exacerbating information, or Control. Regression analyses were used to examine differences between conditions.

RESULTS:

In Study 1, participants randomized to Control reported significantly higher on the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), Competence Scale (CS), Academic Efficacy Scale (AES) and Educational Potential Scale (EPS). CS was significantly higher in the Low EA-PGS + Mitigating information condition. CS and AES were significantly lower in the Low EA-PGS + Exacerbating information condition compared to the Low EA-PGS + Mitigating information condition. In Study 2, participants randomized to Control reported significantly higher CS and AES. Pairwise comparisons did not show significant differences in CS and AES. Follow-up pairwise comparisons using Tukey P-value correction did not find significant associations between non-control conditions.

CONCLUSION:

These studies replicated the polygenic Pygmalion effect yet were insufficiently powered to detect significant effects of mitigating contextual information. Regardless of contextual information, disappointing EA-PGS results were significantly associated with lower assessments of self-esteem, competence, academic efficacy, and educational potential.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Herencia Multifactorial Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Acta Psychol (Amst) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Herencia Multifactorial Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Acta Psychol (Amst) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Países Bajos