Minimally invasive surgery compared to endoscopic intervention for treating infected pancreatic necrosis. A meta-analysis.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne
; 19(2): 141-151, 2024 Jun.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38973796
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
The current study aimed to compare the outcomes of endoscopic and minimally invasive surgical treatment for infected necrotizing pancreatitis. Material andmethods:
A meta-analysis of clinical studies on minimally invasive operations for necrotic infection was conducted. A systematic review and study inclusion were done on multiple databases. English-language prospective comparison studies were included. Random design was used to analyze research with continuous and dichotomous variables.Results:
Ten studies were included in the current study. When compared to minimally invasive surgery, endoscopic procedures showed significant beneficial outcomes regarding low post-operative complication rates (p = 0.006), new onset organ failure (p < 0.001), and pancreatic fistula (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the two interventions regarding hospital stay, postoperative bleeding, incisional hernia, endocrine insufficiency, and perforation of a visceral organ.Conclusions:
Endoscopic therapy appears to have potential advantages over minimally invasive surgery. However, there is no difference between interventions regarding several parameters.
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne
Año:
2024
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
China
Pais de publicación:
Polonia