Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of injury mechanism on early wound closure in patients with acute conflict-related extremity wounds: A prospective cohort analysis from two civilian hospitals in Iraq and Jordan.
Haque, Ghazal; Haweizy, Rawand; Bashaireh, Khaldoon; Malmstedt, Jonas; Älgå, Andreas.
Afiliación
  • Haque G; Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Haweizy R; College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq.
  • Bashaireh K; Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
  • Malmstedt J; Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Älgå A; Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
World J Surg ; 48(8): 1822-1828, 2024 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38970237
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Gunshots and bomb blasts are important causes of extremity injuries in conflict zones, yet little research exists on the characteristics and outcomes of these injuries in civilian populations.

METHODS:

We performed a prospective cohort analysis utilizing data from a randomized trial conducted at two civilian hospitals in Jordan and Iraq in 2015-2019. Adults who presented ≤72 h of sustaining an extremity injury were included. We used mechanism of injury (gunshot/bomb blast) as the exposure and wound closure by day 5 as the primary outcome measure.

RESULTS:

The population predominantly comprised young men (n = 163, 94% male, and median age 29 years) injured by gunshots (61%) or bomb blasts (39%). Compared with the gunshot group, more participants in the bomb blast group had concomitant injuries (32/63 [51%] vs. 11/100 [11%], p < 0.001) and vascular injuries (9/63 [14%] vs. 4/100 [4%], p = 0.02). The wounds were larger in the bomb blast group compared with the gunshot group (median area 86 cm2 [IQR 24-161] vs. 21 cm2 [IQR 7-57], p < 0.001). Compared with the bomb blast group, significantly more participants in the gunshot group achieved wound closure by day 5 (74/100 [74%] vs. 16/63 [25%], p < 0.001). This difference remained after controlling for confounding factors (odds ratio 4.7, 95% confidence interval 1.6-13.7).

CONCLUSIONS:

In civilians with conflict-related extremity injuries, bomb blast wounds had a lower likelihood of achieving closure within 5 days than gunshot wounds, independent of other factors, such as wound size and vascular injuries. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02444598. Registered 14-05-2015, https//classic. CLINICALTRIALS gov/ct2/show/NCT02444598.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Heridas por Arma de Fuego Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: World J Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Heridas por Arma de Fuego Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: World J Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos