Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative evaluation of microhardness of three restorative materials after immersion in chlorhexidine mouthwash: An in vitro study.
Shah, Shilpa S; Patel, Nishtha K; Yagnik, Kruti P; Vyas, Aarshati; Doshi, Prerak; Keshrani, Pooja R.
Afiliación
  • Shah SS; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
  • Patel NK; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
  • Yagnik KP; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
  • Vyas A; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
  • Doshi P; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
  • Keshrani PR; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
J Conserv Dent Endod ; 27(5): 520-523, 2024 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38939552
ABSTRACT

Aim:

To evaluate and compare the microhardness of Filtek Z250XT, Beautifil II, and Neo Spectra ST HV after immersion in chlorhexidine mouthwash. Materials and

Methods:

Thirty disc specimens (10 for each group) made of three different restorative materials, Group 1 - Filtek (3M ESPE), Group 2 - Beautifil II (Shofu), and Group 3 - Neo Spectra ST HV (Dentsply). To simulate 1 year of daily mouthwash use, 10 specimens from each group were immersed in chlorhexidine, kept in an incubator at 37°C for 12 h, and later subjected to microhardness measurement using Vicker's hardness test. Finally, analysis of variance and post hoc tests were used to analyze the results statistically.

Results:

A significant reduction in microhardness was observed after immersion in chlorhexidine in Groups 1 and 3 compared to Group 2.

Conclusions:

Filtek Z250XT exhibits the highest microhardness compared to the other two materials. However, Beautifil II is more resistant to chlorhexidine mouthwash and does not show a significant reduction compared to the other two restorative materials.
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Conserv Dent Endod Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India Pais de publicación: India
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Conserv Dent Endod Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India Pais de publicación: India