Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
NeurostimML: a machine learning model for predicting neurostimulation-induced tissue damage.
Li, Yi; Frederick, Rebecca A; George, Daniel; Cogan, Stuart F; Pancrazio, Joseph J; Bleris, Leonidas; Hernandez-Reynoso, Ana G.
Afiliación
  • Li Y; Department of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States of America.
  • Frederick RA; Center for Systems Biology, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States of America.
  • George D; Phil and Penny Knight Campus for Accelerating Scientific Impact, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States of America.
  • Cogan SF; Department of Computer Science, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States of America.
  • Pancrazio JJ; Department of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States of America.
  • Bleris L; Department of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States of America.
  • Hernandez-Reynoso AG; Department of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States of America.
J Neural Eng ; 21(3)2024 Jun 27.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38885676
ABSTRACT
Objective. The safe delivery of electrical current to neural tissue depends on many factors, yet previous methods for predicting tissue damage rely on only a few stimulation parameters. Here, we report the development of a machine learning approach that could lead to a more reliable method for predicting electrical stimulation-induced tissue damage by incorporating additional stimulation parameters.Approach. A literature search was conducted to build an initial database of tissue response information after electrical stimulation, categorized as either damaging or non-damaging. Subsequently, we used ordinal encoding and random forest for feature selection, and investigated four machine learning models for classification Logistic Regression, K-nearest Neighbor, Random Forest, and Multilayer Perceptron. Finally, we compared the results of these models against the accuracy of the Shannon equation.Main Results. We compiled a database with 387 unique stimulation parameter combinations collected from 58 independent studies conducted over a period of 47 years, with 195 (51%) categorized as non-damaging and 190 (49%) categorized as damaging. The features selected for building our model with a Random Forest algorithm were waveform shape, geometric surface area, pulse width, frequency, pulse amplitude, charge per phase, charge density, current density, duty cycle, daily stimulation duration, daily number of pulses delivered, and daily accumulated charge. The Shannon equation yielded an accuracy of 63.9% using akvalue of 1.79. In contrast, the Random Forest algorithm was able to robustly predict whether a set of stimulation parameters was classified as damaging or non-damaging with an accuracy of 88.3%.Significance. This novel Random Forest model can facilitate more informed decision making in the selection of neuromodulation parameters for both research studies and clinical practice. This study represents the first approach to use machine learning in the prediction of stimulation-induced neural tissue damage, and lays the groundwork for neurostimulation driven by machine learning models.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aprendizaje Automático Límite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Neural Eng Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aprendizaje Automático Límite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Neural Eng Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido