Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Testing a Brief Quitline Intervention for Tobacco Cannabis Co-Users: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.
Carpenter, Kelly M; Walker, Denise D; Mullis, Kristina; Berlin, Helena M; Short, Etta; Javitz, Harold S; Carlini, Beatriz H.
Afiliación
  • Carpenter KM; Center for Wellbeing Research, RVO Health, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Walker DD; University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Mullis K; Center for Wellbeing Research, RVO Health, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Berlin HM; Center for Wellbeing Research, RVO Health, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Short E; RVO Health, Fort Mills, SC, USA.
  • Javitz HS; Independent Statistical Consultant.
  • Carlini BH; University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Tob Use Insights ; 17: 1179173X241261302, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38873657
ABSTRACT

Background:

Tobacco cannabis co-use is common and becoming more prevalent. Frequent and heavy users of cannabis may struggle to quit smoking. Quitlines offer free cessation treatment in the United States and 25% of quitline callers may also be cannabis users. The present paper describes a randomized pilot study of a tailored intervention for cannabis and cigarette co-users. The intervention combines the quitline smoking cessation treatment with a motivational enhancement therapy-based cannabis intervention.

Methods:

The randomized pilot study was conducted within four state-funded quitlines with quitline coaches as interventionists. 102 quitline callers who were cannabis and cigarette co-users were randomized to receive treatment as usual (TAU) or the new Quitline Check-Up (QLCU) intervention. Outcomes were collected 90 days post-randomization. Primary outcomes included feasibility and acceptability of delivering the QLCU in the quitline setting. Secondary outcomes included 7-day point prevalence tobacco abstinence, past 30-day cannabis use, and Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test scores.

Results:

Study participants were heavy cannabis users, averaging 25 days of use in the past 30; nearly 70% used at a level considered hazardous. Fidelity ratings indicated coaches were successful at delivering the intervention. Treatment engagement was high for both groups (TAU m = 3.4 calls; QLCU m = 3.6 calls) as was treatment satisfaction. Intent-to-treat quit rates (with survey non-responders classified as smokers) were 28.6% for the TAU control group and 24.5% for the QLCU group (P = .45).

Discussion:

Hazardous cannabis use rates were high in this sample of tobacco cannabis co-users calling quitlines to quit smoking. The intervention for co-users was acceptable and feasible to deliver. No improvements in tobacco cessation outcomes were observed. Pragmatic intervention development within a real-world clinical setting can streamline the intervention development process. More research is needed on tobacco cannabis co-users and who can benefit from a tailored intervention. Registered ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04737772, February 4, 2021.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Tob Use Insights Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Tob Use Insights Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos