Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of an interprofessional assessment and management approach for people with chronic low back disorders delivered via virtual care: A randomized controlled trial pilot intervention.
Lovo, Stacey; Imeah, Biaka; Sari, Nazmi; O'Connell, Megan E; Milosavljevic, Steve; Angarita-Fonseca, Adriana; Bath, Brenna.
Afiliación
  • Lovo S; School of Rehabilitation Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
  • Imeah B; Ministry of Social Services, Government of Saskatchewan, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
  • Sari N; Department of Economics, College of Arts and Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
  • O'Connell ME; Department of Economics, College of Arts and Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
  • Milosavljevic S; School of Rehabilitation Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
  • Angarita-Fonseca A; College of Arts and Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
  • Bath B; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Rouyn Noranda, Quebec, Canada.
Digit Health ; 10: 20552076241260569, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38846367
ABSTRACT

Objective:

Virtual care for chronic conditions has seen uptake due to COVID-19. Evaluation of virtual models is important to ensure evidence-based practice. There is a paucity of research in the use of virtual care for management of chronic back disorders. The objective of this study was to evaluate effectiveness of a team-based virtual care model for back disorder assessment where a physical therapist uses virtual care to join a nurse practitioner and patient in a rural Saskatchewan, Canada community.

Methods:

Sixty-four rural adults with chronic back disorders were randomly allocated to receive either (1) team-based virtual care (n = 24); (2) care from an urban physical therapist travelling to community (n = 20); or (3) care from a rural nurse practitioner (n = 20). The team-based care group involved a nurse practitioner located with a rural patient, and a physical therapist joining using virtual care. The physical therapist alone and the nurse practitioner alone groups received in-person assessments. Groups with a physical therapist involved had follow-up treatments by in-person physical therapy. Outcomes over six months included pain, disability, back beliefs, satisfaction, quality-adjusted health status and management-related costs.

Results:

There were no significant differences for pain, disability, back beliefs and satisfaction between groups. The average cost per patient for implementing in-person physical therapist assessment ($135) was higher compared with the team over virtual care ($118) and NP care ($59).

Conclusion:

Primary outcomes were not different by group. Physical therapist alone was more costly than other groups. Future research should include more participants, longer follow-up time and refined cost parameters. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02225535; https//clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02225535 (Archived by WebCite at http//www.webcitation.org/6lqLTCNF7).
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Digit Health Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Digit Health Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos