Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Disability level and use of long-term care services in Norway: a nation-wide registry study.
Burrell, Lisa Victoria; Døhl, Øystein; Rostoft, Siri; Berggaard, Nina; Antonova, Iryna; Johanne Landsjøåsen Bakken, Inger.
Afiliación
  • Burrell LV; Centre for Care Research, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway.
  • Døhl Ø; Department of Finance, Trondheim Municipality, Norway.
  • Rostoft S; Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway.
  • Berggaard N; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
  • Antonova I; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.
  • Johanne Landsjøåsen Bakken I; Division of Health Data and Digitalisation, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Norway.
Scand J Public Health ; : 14034948241251914, 2024 Jun 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38835190
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

In Norway, disability level is an important criterion when deciding the type and level of long-term care services. Each care recipient can be scored on 20 different disability level measures. Our aims were to investigate completeness in disability level information in the Norwegian Registry of Primary Health Care (NRPHC), to group disability level measures into meaningful groups, and to study the relationship between grouped disability scores and the type of services received.

METHODS:

We retrieved information on type of care and disability level from the NRPHC on individuals who received long-term care services in 2022. Type of care was divided into hierarchical and mutually exclusive groups, with long-term institutional care as the most complex service group. We used principal components analysis to summarise and visualise the information in the 20 different disability level measures, and to create grouped scores.

RESULTS:

A total of 386,697 persons aged 0-104 years were registered as recipients of long-term care services in Norway on 31 December 2022. Information on disability measures were of high completeness (72.4 % of the population were registered with all 20 measures) but was lower for younger age groups in which the number of recipients was lower. Principal components analyses identified two groups of measures, which we termed physical and cognitive functioning. Physical and cognitive functioning were poorest for individuals receiving the most complex and extensive services.

CONCLUSIONS:

NRPHC disability data are reasonably complete, the 20 measures readily fall into two distinct categories, and seem to reflect real life differences in disability.
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Public Health Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA SOCIAL / SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Noruega Pais de publicación: Suecia
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Public Health Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA SOCIAL / SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Noruega Pais de publicación: Suecia