Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Societal implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision.
Brindis, Claire D; Laitner, Melissa H; Clayton, Ellen Wright; Scrimshaw, Susan C; Grosz, Barbara J; Simpson, Lisa A; Rosenbaum, Sara; Brierley, Corale L; Simon, Melissa A; Roubideaux, Yvette; Calonge, Bruce N; Johnson, Paula A; DeStefano, Laura; Bear, Ashley; Arora, Kavita S; Dzau, Victor J.
Afiliación
  • Brindis CD; Philip R Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Health, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. Electronic address: cla
  • Laitner MH; National Academy of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Clayton EW; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Scrimshaw SC; Scrimshaw Consulting, Thornton, NH, USA.
  • Grosz BJ; Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Simpson LA; AcademyHealth, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Rosenbaum S; George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Brierley CL; Brierley Consultancy, Highlands Ranch, CO, USA.
  • Simon MA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Roubideaux Y; Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Calonge BN; Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Johnson PA; Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA, USA.
  • DeStefano L; National Academy of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Bear A; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Arora KS; General Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Midwifery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Dzau VJ; National Academy of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Lancet ; 403(10445): 2751-2754, 2024 Jun 22.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38795714
ABSTRACT
On June 24, 2022, the US Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization marked the removal of the constitutional right to abortion in the USA, introducing a complex ethical and legal landscape for patients and providers. This shift has had immediate health and equity repercussions, but it is also crucial to examine the broader impacts on states, health-care systems, and society as a whole. Restrictions on abortion access extend beyond immediate reproductive care concerns, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of the ruling's consequences across micro and macro levels. To mitigate potential harm, it is imperative to establish a research agenda that informs policy making and ensures effective long-term monitoring and reporting, addressing both immediate and future impacts.
Asunto(s)
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Salud de la Mujer / Decisiones de la Corte Suprema Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Lancet Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Salud de la Mujer / Decisiones de la Corte Suprema Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Lancet Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido