Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Non-linear Mendelian randomization: detection of biases using negative controls with a focus on BMI, Vitamin D and LDL cholesterol.
Hamilton, Fergus W; Hughes, David A; Spiller, Wes; Tilling, Kate; Davey Smith, George.
Afiliación
  • Hamilton FW; MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Road, BS8 2PS, Bristol, UK. Fergus.hamilton@bristol.ac.uk.
  • Hughes DA; Infection Science, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK. Fergus.hamilton@bristol.ac.uk.
  • Spiller W; MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Road, BS8 2PS, Bristol, UK.
  • Tilling K; MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Road, BS8 2PS, Bristol, UK.
  • Davey Smith G; MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Road, BS8 2PS, Bristol, UK.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 39(5): 451-465, 2024 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38789826
ABSTRACT
Mendelian randomisation (MR) is an established technique in epidemiological investigation, using the principle of random allocation of genetic variants at conception to estimate the causal linear effect of an exposure on an outcome. Extensions to this technique include non-linear approaches that allow for differential effects of the exposure on the outcome depending on the level of the exposure. A widely used non-linear method is the residual approach, which estimates the causal effect within different strata of the non-genetically predicted exposure (i.e. the "residual" exposure). These "local" causal estimates are then used to make inferences about non-linear effects. Recent work has identified that this method can lead to estimates that are seriously biased, and a new method-the doubly-ranked method-has been introduced as a possibly more robust approach. In this paper, we perform negative control outcome analyses in the MR context. These are analyses with outcomes onto which the exposure should have no predicted causal effect. Using both methods we find clearly biased estimates in certain situations. We additionally examined a situation for which there are robust randomised controlled trial estimates of effects-that of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction onto myocardial infarction, where randomised trials have provided strong evidence of the shape of the relationship. The doubly-ranked method did not identify the same shape as the trial data, and for LDL-C and other lipids they generated some highly implausible findings. Therefore, we suggest there should be extensive simulation and empirical methodological examination of performance of both methods for NLMR under different conditions before further use of these methods. In the interim, use of NLMR methods needs justification, and a number of sanity checks (such as analysis of negative and positive control outcomes, sensitivity analyses excluding removal of strata at the extremes of the distribution, examination of biological plausibility and triangulation of results) should be performed.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Vitamina D / Sesgo / Índice de Masa Corporal / Análisis de la Aleatorización Mendeliana / LDL-Colesterol Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Epidemiol Asunto de la revista: EPIDEMIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Vitamina D / Sesgo / Índice de Masa Corporal / Análisis de la Aleatorización Mendeliana / LDL-Colesterol Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Epidemiol Asunto de la revista: EPIDEMIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Países Bajos