Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Chemical effects on neural network activity: Comparison of acute versus network formation exposure in microelectrode array assays.
Martin, Melissa M; Carpenter, Amy F; Shafer, Timothy J; Paul Friedman, Katie; Carstens, Kelly E.
Afiliación
  • Martin MM; Computational Toxicology & Bioinformatics Branch, Biomolecular and Computational Toxicology Division, CCTE/ORD, US. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.
  • Carpenter AF; Computational Toxicology & Bioinformatics Branch, Biomolecular and Computational Toxicology Division, CCTE/ORD, US. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
  • Shafer TJ; Computational Toxicology & Bioinformatics Branch, Biomolecular and Computational Toxicology Division, CCTE/ORD, US. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.
  • Paul Friedman K; Computational Toxicology & Bioinformatics Branch, Biomolecular and Computational Toxicology Division, CCTE/ORD, US. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.
  • Carstens KE; Computational Toxicology & Bioinformatics Branch, Biomolecular and Computational Toxicology Division, CCTE/ORD, US. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA. Electronic address: Carstens.kelly@epa.gov.
Toxicology ; 505: 153842, 2024 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38788893
ABSTRACT
New approach methodologies (NAMs) can address information gaps on potential neurotoxicity or developmental neurotoxicity hazard for data-poor chemicals. Two assays have been previously developed using microelectrode arrays (MEA), a technology which measures neural activity. The MEA acute network function assay (AcN) uses dissociated rat cortical cells cultured at postnatal day 0 and evaluates network activity during a 40-minute chemical exposure on day in vitro (DIV)13 or 15. In contrast, the MEA network formation assay (NFA) uses a developmental exposure paradigm spanning DIV0 through DIV12. Measures of network activity over time at DIV5, 7, 9, and 12 in the NFA are reduced to an estimated area under the curve to facilitate concentration-response evaluation. Here, we evaluated the hypothesis that chemicals with effects in the AcN also perturb the NFA by examining quantitative and qualitative concordance between assays. Out of 243 chemicals screened in both assays, we observed 70.3% concordance between the AcN and NFA after eliminating activity inferred to be cytotoxic (selective activity), with the majority of discordance explained by chemicals that altered selective activity in the AcN but not NFA. The NFA detected more active chemicals when evaluating activity associated with cytotoxicity. Median potency values were lower in the NFA compared to the AcN, but within-chemical potency values were not uniformly lower in the NFA than the AcN. Lastly, the AcN and NFA captured unique bioactivity fingerprints; the AcN was more informative for identifying chemicals with a shared mode of action, while the NFA provided information relevant to developmental exposure. Taken together, this analysis provides a rationale for using both approaches for chemical evaluation with consideration of the context of use, such as screening/ prioritization, hazard identification, or to address questions regarding biological mechanism or function.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Microelectrodos / Red Nerviosa Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Toxicology Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Irlanda

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Microelectrodos / Red Nerviosa Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Toxicology Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Irlanda