Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of electrical microstimulation artifact removal methods for high-channel-count prostheses.
Wang, Feng; Chen, Xing; Roelfsema, Pieter R.
Afiliación
  • Wang F; Department of Vision & Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (KNAW), Amsterdam 1105 BA, the Netherlands. Electronic address: f.wang@nin.knaw.nl.
  • Chen X; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 203 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, US. Electronic address: x.chen@pitt.edu.
  • Roelfsema PR; Department of Vision & Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (KNAW), Amsterdam 1105 BA, the Netherlands; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 203 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, US; Department of Integrative Neurophysiology, VU University, De Boelelaan 1085, Amsterdam 1081 HV, the Netherlands; Department of Neurosurgery, Academic Medical Centre, Postbus 22660, Amsterdam 1100 DD, the Netherlands; Laboratory of Visual Brain Therapy, Sorbonne U
J Neurosci Methods ; 408: 110169, 2024 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782123
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Neuroprostheses are used to electrically stimulate the brain, modulate neural activity and restore sensory and motor function following injury or disease, such as blindness, paralysis, and other movement and psychiatric disorders. Recordings are often made simultaneously with stimulation, allowing the monitoring of neural signals and closed-loop control of devices. However, stimulation-evoked artifacts may obscure neural activity, particularly when stimulation and recording sites are nearby. Several methods have been developed to remove stimulation artifacts, but it remains challenging to validate and compare these methods because the 'ground-truth' of the neuronal signals may be contaminated by artifacts. NEW

METHOD:

Here, we delivered stimulation to the visual cortex via a high-channel-count prosthesis while recording neuronal activity and stimulation artifacts. We quantified the waveforms and temporal properties of stimulation artifacts from the cortical visual prosthesis (CVP) and used them to build a dataset, in which we simulated the neuronal activity and the stimulation artifacts. We illustrate how to use the simulated data to evaluate the performance of six software-based artifact removal methods (Template subtraction, Linear interpolation, Polynomial fitting, Exponential fitting, SALPA and ERAASR) in a CVP application scenario.

RESULTS:

We here focused on stimulation artifacts caused by electrical stimulation through a high-channel-count cortical prosthesis device. We find that the Polynomial fitting and Exponential fitting methods outperform the other methods in recovering spikes and multi-unit activity. Linear interpolation and Template subtraction recovered the local-field potentials.

CONCLUSION:

Polynomial fitting and Exponential fitting provided a good trade-off between the quality of the recovery of spikes and multi-unit activity (MUA) and the computational complexity for a cortical prosthesis.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Corteza Visual / Artefactos / Estimulación Eléctrica / Prótesis Visuales Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Neurosci Methods Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Países Bajos
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Corteza Visual / Artefactos / Estimulación Eléctrica / Prótesis Visuales Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Neurosci Methods Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Países Bajos