Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Study of biocapacity areas to reduce ecological footprint deficits: A case study of Turkey.
Pençe, Ihsan; Çesmeli, Melike Siseci; Kumas, Kazim; Akyüz, Ali; Tuncer, Azim Dogus; Güngör, Afsin.
Afiliación
  • Pençe I; Department of Software Engineering, Bucak Faculty of Technology, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, 15300 Bucak, Burdur, Turkey.
  • Çesmeli MS; Department of Software Engineering, Bucak Faculty of Technology, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, 15300 Bucak, Burdur, Turkey.
  • Kumas K; Bucak Emin Gulmez Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, 15300 Bucak, Burdur, Turkey.
  • Akyüz A; Bucak Emin Gulmez Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, 15300 Bucak, Burdur, Turkey.
  • Tuncer AD; Department of Energy Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering-Architecture, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Turkey. Electronic address: azimdtuncer@gmail.com.
  • Güngör A; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Akdeniz University, 07058 Antalya, Turkey; ASHRAE Turkish Chapter, Refrigeration Committee, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sci Total Environ ; 932: 173018, 2024 Jul 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38719046
ABSTRACT
Our world has had difficulty meeting humans' needs in recent years. To ensure that the world can sustain its inhabitability and self-sufficiency in terms of natural resources, it is required to make the total amount of biocapacity areas equal to or higher than the ecological footprint. An analytical study has been carried out to remedy the biocapacity deficit by utilizing this information for Turkey and then these areas are optimized with heuristic optimization techniques. As a result, Artificial Bee Colony provides better objective function results (fewer errors) compared to Particle Swarm Optimization and Global Optimization Method Based on Clustering and Parabolic Approximation in terms of minimum, maximum, average value, and standard deviation. The rates of change according to the current situation of the biocapacity areas in 2016 are 277.97 %, 30.28 %, -29.28 %, 14.97 %, and -44.85 % for cropland, grazing land, forestland, fishing grounds, and built-up land, respectively. Depending on the population growth, these rates should additionally change by 83.24 %, -0.69 %, 3.97 %, 6.22 %, and -14.24 % respectively in 2050. The developed model can be used in industry or within the frame of government development policy and thus the balance between ecological footprint and biocapacity can be kept under control.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conservación de los Recursos Naturales País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Sci Total Environ Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía Pais de publicación: Países Bajos
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conservación de los Recursos Naturales País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Sci Total Environ Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía Pais de publicación: Países Bajos