Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Glenoid track and subcritical Hill-Sachs lesion.
Yamamoto, Nobuyuki; Aizawa, Toshimi; Itoi, Eiji.
Afiliación
  • Yamamoto N; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
  • Aizawa T; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
  • Itoi E; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
JSES Int ; 8(3): 608-613, 2024 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38707566
ABSTRACT

Background:

We have proposed the concept of glenoid track ("on-track/off-track" lesion) to evaluate the risk of engagement of the Hill-Sachs lesion with the glenoid after arthroscopic Bankart repair. This concept has been widely used and many clinical validation studies have been reported. To measure the glenoid track width, we have recommended to use 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) images. However, the CT method has the issue of radiation exposure and involves time and effort to make 3-dimensional CT images from 2-dimensional images. For these reasons, there are several reports describing the measurement method using magnetic resonance imaging. Recently, the threshold of the critical glenoid bone loss becomes lower. A zone of bone loss below the critical size is called "subcritical bone loss", which might be related to deterioration of quality of life and bone grafting is recommended. We applied the concept of "subcritical bone loss" to the glenoid track. Patients with "on-track" lesions can be divided into 2 subgroups those with a "peripheral-track" lesion (most medial 1/4) and those with a "central-track" lesion (the rest 3/4). More recently, similar evaluation methods to evaluate the risk of "off-track" lesions have been reported ''distance to dislocation'' and "Hill-Sachs interval/glenoid track ratio". Also, similar concept to "peripheral-track" lesion, "near-track" lesion was reported. The concept of "peripheral-track" lesion is a concept of assessing an "on-track" lesion which is very close to the medial margin of the glenoid track (subcritical bone loss).

Methods:

Similar evaluation methods to evaluate the risk of "off-track" or "peripheral-track" lesions were proposed in the literature. A review was performed by searching PubMed. Journal articles published between January 2014 and January 2023 were taken into account. They were compared and their differences were explained.

Results:

The "near-track" lesion concept is similar to "peripheral-track" lesion. However, the cutoff value is different Hill-Sachs occupancy ≥ 75% is the "peripheral-track" lesion, whereas "distance to dislocation" < 8 mm is the "near-track" lesion.

Conclusion:

We introduced update of the glenoid track concept including the evaluation method, peripheral-track lesion, and its clinical application.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: JSES Int Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: JSES Int Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos