Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Preformed Elastodontic Appliances: Awareness and Attitude of Orthodontists and General Dental Practitioners.
Cannatà, Davide; Galdi, Marzio; Martina, Stefano; Rongo, Roberto; D'Antò, Vincenzo; Valletta, Rosa; Bucci, Rosaria.
Afiliación
  • Cannatà D; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Via Allende, 84081 Baronissi, SA, Italy.
  • Galdi M; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Via Allende, 84081 Baronissi, SA, Italy.
  • Martina S; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Via Allende, 84081 Baronissi, SA, Italy.
  • Rongo R; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Oral Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, NA, Italy.
  • D'Antò V; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Oral Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, NA, Italy.
  • Valletta R; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Oral Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, NA, Italy.
  • Bucci R; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Oral Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, NA, Italy.
Children (Basel) ; 11(4)2024 Apr 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38671635
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Preformed elastodontic appliances (EAs) have been described as safe, cost-effective, and easy-to-use devices for interceptive orthodontic treatment in growing patients. This study aimed to assess the knowledge and the attitude of dentists toward the use of EAs and to compare the behaviors of orthodontists (Os) with those of general dental practitioners (GDPs).

METHODS:

An anonymous survey was distributed among dentists through social media. Twenty-two items were divided as follows characteristics of respondents; general knowledge about EAs; section for EA-users; and section for EA non-users. Chi-squared tests were used to analyze differences in responses between groups.

RESULTS:

Participants included 226 Os and 168 GDPs. The majority in both groups reported having adequate knowledge about EAs and utilizing them in their practice. GDPs usually use EAs to treat children during the early phase of growth, while Os also use EAs to address orthodontic problems in different stages of dentition, experiencing a chair time reduction compared with traditional appliances. Regarding EA non-users, GDPs seem not to find an application among their patients, whereas Os reported not having enough patient compliance during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although treatment with EAs is common among all dentists, differences exist between Os and GDPs in the awareness and application, as well as in the reasons provided for not using EAs.
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Children (Basel) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia Pais de publicación: Suiza
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Children (Basel) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia Pais de publicación: Suiza