Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patients' views on primary care multidisciplinary teams in Scotland: a mixed-methods evaluation.
Sweeney, Kieran D; Donaghy, Eddie; Henderson, David; Wang, Harry Hx; Thompson, Andrew; Guthrie, Bruce; Mercer, Stewart W.
Afiliación
  • Sweeney KD; Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom ksweeney@ed.ac.uk.
  • Donaghy E; Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
  • Henderson D; Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
  • Wang HH; School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Thompson A; School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
  • Guthrie B; Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
  • Mercer SW; Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
BJGP Open ; 2024 Sep 17.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38663983
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Expanding primary care multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) was a key component of the 2018 Scottish GP contract, with more than 4700 MDT staff appointed since then.

AIM:

To explore patients' views on primary care MDT expansion in Scotland. DESIGN &

SETTING:

A mixed-methods evaluation, which included a postal survey and semi-structured telephone interviews with patients in Scotland.

METHOD:

A survey was undertaken of patients who had recently consulted a GP in deprived urban, affluent urban, and remote and rural areas, assessing awareness of five MDT roles and attitudes towards receptionist signposting. In addition, 30 individual interviews were conducted, exploring patients' MDT-care experiences.

RESULTS:

Of 1053 survey responders, most were unaware of the option of MDT rather than GP consultations for three out of five roles (69% unaware of link worker appointments; 69% mental health nurse; and 58% pharmacist). Reception signposting was less popular in deprived urban areas (34% unhappy versus 29% in remote and rural versus 21% affluent urban; P<0.001), and in patients with multimorbidity (31% unhappy versus 24% in non-multimorbid; P<0.05). Just over two-thirds of interviewees had multimorbidity and almost all reported positive MDT-care experiences. However, MDT care was generally seen as a supplement rather than a substitute for GP care. Around half of patients expressed concerns about reception signposting. These patients were more likely to also express concerns about GP access in general. Both of these concerns were more common in deprived urban areas than in remote and rural or affluent urban areas.

CONCLUSION:

MDT care has expanded in Scotland with limited patient awareness. Although patients understand its potential value, many are unhappy with reception signposting to first-contact MDT care, especially those in deprived urban areas living with multimorbidity. This represents a barrier to the aims of the new GP contract.
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: BJGP Open Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido Pais de publicación: Reino Unido
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: BJGP Open Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido Pais de publicación: Reino Unido