Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Magnetic resonance imaging for jawbone assessment: a systematic review.
Parize, Hian; Sadilina, Sofya; Caldas, Ricardo Armini; Cordeiro, João Victor Cunha; Kleinheinz, Johannes; Laganá, Dalva Cruz; Sesma, Newton; Bohner, Lauren.
Afiliación
  • Parize H; Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Munster, Munster, Germany.
  • Sadilina S; Department of Prosthodontics, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Caldas RA; Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Munster, Munster, Germany.
  • Cordeiro JVC; Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Kleinheinz J; Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, R. Delfino Conti, 1240 - Trindade, Florianopolis, Florianópolis, 88040-535, SC, Brazil. ricardo.caldas@ufsc.br.
  • Laganá DC; Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, R. Delfino Conti, 1240 - Trindade, Florianopolis, Florianópolis, 88040-535, SC, Brazil.
  • Sesma N; Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Munster, Munster, Germany.
  • Bohner L; Department of Prosthodontics, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Head Face Med ; 20(1): 25, 2024 Apr 19.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38641613
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for jawbone assessment compared to reference-standard measurements in the literature. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

An electronic database search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library in June 2022, and updated in August 2023. Studies evaluating the accuracy of MRI for jawbone assessment compared with reference-standard measurements (histology, physical measurements, or computed tomography) were included. The outcome measures included bone histomorphometry and linear measurements. The risk of bias was assessed by the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). The review was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022342697).

RESULTS:

From 63 studies selected for full-text analysis, nine manuscripts were considered eligible for this review. The studies included assessments of 54 participants, 35 cadavers, and one phantom. A linear measurement error ranging from 0.03 to 3.11 mm was shown. The accuracy of bone histomorphometry varies among studies. Limitations of the evidence included heterogeneity of MRI protocols and the methodology of the included studies.

CONCLUSION:

Few studies have suggested the feasibility of MRI for jawbone assessment, as MRI provides comparable results to those of standard reference tests. However, further advancements and optimizations are needed to increase the applicability, validate the efficacy, and establish clinical utility of these methods.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Head Face Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA / ODONTOLOGIA / ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania Pais de publicación: Reino Unido
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Head Face Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA / ODONTOLOGIA / ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania Pais de publicación: Reino Unido