Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the Implementation of the Dutch Breast Cancer Surveillance Decision Aid including Personalized Risk Estimates in the SHOUT-BC Study: A Mixed Methods Approach.
Ankersmid, Jet W; Engelhardt, Ellen G; Lansink Rotgerink, Fleur K; The, Regina; Strobbe, Luc J A; Drossaert, Constance H C; Siesling, Sabine; van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F.
Afiliación
  • Ankersmid JW; Department of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.
  • Engelhardt EG; Santeon, 3584 AA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Lansink Rotgerink FK; Santeon, 3584 AA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • The R; Santeon, 3584 AA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Strobbe LJA; ZorgKeuzeLab, 2611 BN Delft, The Netherlands.
  • Drossaert CHC; Department of Surgery, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Siesling S; Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.
  • van Uden-Kraan CF; Department of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(7)2024 Mar 31.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38611068
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To improve Shared decision-making (SDM) regarding personalized post-treatment surveillance, the Breast Cancer Surveillance Decision Aid (BCS-PtDA), integrating personalized risk information, was developed and implemented in eight hospitals. The aim of this mixed-methods study was to (1) assess the implementation and participation rates, (2) identify facilitators and barriers for use by health care professionals (HCPs), (3) quantify the observed level of SDM, and (4) evaluate risk communication and SDM application in consultations.

METHODS:

Implementation and participation rates and patients' BCS-PtDA use were calculated using hospital registry data and BCS-PtDA log data. HCPs' perspective on facilitators and barriers were collected using the MIDI framework. Observed SDM levels in consultation transcripts were quantified using the OPTION-5 scale. Thematic analysis was performed to assess consultation content.

RESULTS:

The average PtDA implementation and participation rates were, respectively, 26% and 61%. HCPs reported that the PtDA supported choice awareness. Reported barriers for implementation were mainly increased workload and a lack of perceived benefits. The consultation analysis (n = 64) showed patients were offered a choice, but deliberation was lacking. Risk communication was generally adequate.

DISCUSSION:

When the BCS-PtDA was used, patients were clearly given a choice regarding their post-treatment surveillance, but information provision and SDM application can be improved.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos Pais de publicación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos Pais de publicación: Suiza