Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The time course of stimulus-specific perceptual learning.
Bennett, Patrick J; Hashemi, Ali; Lass, Jordan W; Sekuler, Allison B; Hussain, Zahra.
Afiliación
  • Bennett PJ; Department of Psychology, Neuroscience, and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Hashemi A; bennett@mcmaster.ca.
  • Lass JW; Department of Psychology, Neuroscience, and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Sekuler AB; alihashemi@mcmaster.ca.
  • Hussain Z; Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, Toronto, Canada.
J Vis ; 24(4): 9, 2024 Apr 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38602837
ABSTRACT
Practice on perceptual tasks can lead to long-lasting, stimulus-specific improvements. Rapid stimulus-specific learning, assessed 24 hours after practice, has been found with just 105 practice trials in a face identification task. However, a much longer time course for stimulus-specific learning has been found in other tasks. Here, we examined 1) whether rapid stimulus-specific learning occurs for unfamiliar, non-face stimuli in a texture identification task; 2) the effects of varying practice across a range from just 21 trials up to 840 trials; and 3) if rapid, stimulus-specific learning persists over a 1-week, as well as a 1-day, interval. Observers performed a texture identification task in two sessions separated by one day (Experiment 1) or 1 week (Experiment 2). Observers received varying amounts of practice (21, 63, 105, or 840 training trials) in session 1 and completed 840 trials in session 2. In session 2, one-half of the observers in each group performed the task with the same textures as in session 1, and one-half switched to novel textures (same vs. novel conditions). In both experiments we found that stimulus-specific learning - defined as the difference in response accuracy in the same and novel conditions - increased as a linear function of the log number of session 1 training trials and was statistically significant after approximately 100 training trials. The effects of stimulus novelty did not differ across experiments. These results support the idea that stimulus-specific learning in our task arises gradually and continuously through practice, perhaps concurrently with general learning.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aprendizaje Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Vis Asunto de la revista: OFTALMOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aprendizaje Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Vis Asunto de la revista: OFTALMOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos